Literature DB >> 16829806

Long-term stability of circumferential silicone sponge scleral buckling exoplants.

David M Brown1, Robert M Beardsley, Richard H Fish, Tien P Wong, Rosa Y Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The historical extrusion/explantation rate of silicone sponge scleral buckle exoplants is 3.5 to 24.4%. This contrasts with the published 0.6 to 1.2% explantation rate of solid silicone elements. Previously reported silicone sponge exoplants studies were noncircumferential (quadrantic or multiple). This study was undertaken to assess the long-term stability of 360 degrees circumferentially placed 3 x 5 mm silicone sponge exoplants.
METHODS: Interventional case series of 840 consecutive circumferentially placed 3 x 5 mm silicone sponge exoplants. A retrospective review of operative reports and patient charts was performed.
RESULTS: A total of 552 patients had documented follow-up over 1 year. Median follow-up was 32.8 months. Six patients underwent removal of the scleral buckling element (two for diplopia, one acute postoperative infection, and three for extrusion). Median time to removal was 7.3 months. Extenuating circumstances contributed to two of the three extrusions. Of the entire series, fewer than 1% of patients required removal of the silicone sponge implant. Excluding patients with less than 1 year of documented follow-up, the long-term infection/extrusion rate was 0.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: Circumferentially placed silicone scleral buckling sponge elements are very stable and are well tolerated. The explantation/extrusion rate is comparable to published solid silicone element series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16829806     DOI: 10.1097/01.iae.0000236473.63819.f4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Retina        ISSN: 0275-004X            Impact factor:   4.256


  6 in total

1.  [Restricted eyeball with proptosis].

Authors:  M Witteborn; S Mennel
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Risk factors for scleral buckle removal: a matched, case-control study.

Authors:  Douglas J Covert; William J Wirostko; Dennis P Han; Kevin E Lindgren; Jill A Hammersley; Thomas B Connor; Judy E Kim
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2008

3.  Orbital cellulitis following silicone-sponge scleral buckles.

Authors:  Arie Y Nemet; Joseph R Ferencz; Ori Segal; Amit Meshi
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-31

4.  Non-drainage scleral buckling with solid silicone elements.

Authors:  Pukhraj Rishi; Ekta Rishi; Aditi Gupta; Cheriyan Shane Mathew; Bhavesh J Shah
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05

5.  The evaluation of ocular refractive error and axial length changes after scleral buckle removal.

Authors:  Ahoor M Hosein; Sorkhabi Rana; Eftekhari M Amir; Ojaghi Habib; Najafi Amin
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2019-09-30

6.  Impact of Duration of Macula off Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment on Visual Outcome.

Authors:  Mahtab Alam Khanzada; Shahid Wahab; Lakhani Das Hargun
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.088

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.