Literature DB >> 16829650

Imaging and oncologic drug development.

Wafik S El-Deiry1, Caroline C Sigman, Gary J Kelloff.   

Abstract

For decades anatomic imaging with computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging has facilitated drug development in medical oncology by providing quantifiable and objective evidence of response to cancer therapy. In recent years metabolic imaging with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography has added an important component to the oncologist's armamentarium for earlier detection of response that is now widely used and appreciated. These modalities along with ultrasound and optical imaging (bioluminescence, fluorescence, near-infrared imaging, multispectral imaging) have become used increasingly in preclinical studies in animal models to document the effects of genetic alterations on cancer progression or metastases, the detection of minimal residual disease, and response to various therapeutics including radiation, chemotherapy, or biologic agents. The field of molecular imaging offers potential to deliver a variety of probes that can image noninvasively drug targets, drug distribution, cancer gene expression, cell surface receptor or oncoprotein levels, and biomarker predictors of prognosis, therapeutic response, or failure. Some applications are best suited to accelerate preclinical anticancer drug development, whereas other technologies may be directly transferable to the clinic. Efforts are underway to apply noninvasive in vivo imaging to specific preclinical or clinical problems to accelerate progress in the field. Because resources are limited, and patient suffering from failed or ineffective therapy continues, a concerted effort is being made to address these issues. Many simultaneous activities involving academia; the pharmaceutical, device, and biotechnology industries; US Food and Drug Administration; National Cancer Institute; Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; and specialized networks sponsored by the National Institutes of Health are beginning to address these issues to develop consensus recommendations and progress in this important area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16829650     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.5623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  24 in total

1.  Pharmacodynamic evaluation of irinotecan therapy by FDG and FLT PET/CT imaging in a colorectal cancer xenograft model.

Authors:  Sarah R Mudd; Kimberley D Holich; Martin J Voorbach; Todd B Cole; David R Reuter; Paul Tapang; Gail Bukofzer; Arunava Chakravartty; Cherrie K Donawho; Joann P Palma; Gerard B Fox; Mark Day; Yanping Luo
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 2.  Biosensors and their applications - A review.

Authors:  Parikha Mehrotra
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2016-01-06

3.  Monitoring disease activity noninvasively in the mdx model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Antonio Filareto; Katie Maguire-Nguyen; Qiang Gan; Garazi Aldanondo; Léo Machado; Jeffrey S Chamberlain; Thomas A Rando
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Automated tracking of quantitative assessments of tumor burden in clinical trials.

Authors:  Daniel L Rubin; Debra Willrett; Martin J O'Connor; Cleber Hage; Camille Kurtz; Dilvan A Moreira
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

5.  Improving CT prediction of treatment response in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma using statistical learning theory.

Authors:  Walker H Land; Dan Margolis; Ronald Gottlieb; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Jack Y Yang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Expression of TCTP antisense in CD25(high) regulatory T cells aggravates cuff-injured vascular inflammation.

Authors:  Zeyu Xiong; Yan Yan; Jian Song; Pu Fang; Ying Yin; Yu Yang; Alan Cowan; Hong Wang; Xiao-Feng Yang
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 5.162

7.  Novel near-infrared fluorescent integrin-targeted DFO analogue.

Authors:  Yunpeng Ye; Sharon Bloch; Baogang Xu; Samuel Achilefu
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 4.774

8.  Generation of a highly inducible Gal4-->Fluc universal reporter mouse for in vivo bioluminescence imaging.

Authors:  Andrea Pichler; Julie L Prior; Gary D Luker; David Piwnica-Worms
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Synthesis of a new NIR fluorescent Nd complex labeling agent.

Authors:  Kazuki Aita; Takashi Temma; Yoichi Shimizu; Yuji Kuge; Koh-Ichi Seki; Hideo Saji
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2009-10-10       Impact factor: 2.217

10.  Molecular imaging with bioluminescence and PET reveals viral oncolysis kinetics and tumor viability.

Authors:  Darshini Kuruppu; Anna-Liisa Brownell; Khalid Shah; Umar Mahmood; Kenneth K Tanabe
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 12.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.