OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effectiveness of a free nicotine patch giveaway program offered to New York City (NYC) smokers conducted in 2003. METHODOLOGY: The effectiveness of the program was assessed by contrasting the 12-month quit rate of program participants with the quit rate from a group of Quitline callers who were not offered free nicotine patches. The follow-up surveys were conducted in 2004 and the analysis in 2005. RESULTS: The 7-day nonsmoking prevalence rate measured at 12 months among callers who received the nicotine patches was 1.78 times higher (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.19-2.66) than the quit rate among a comparable group of callers to the Quitline from NYC a year earlier who did not receive nicotine patches. CONCLUSIONS: The provision of free nicotine patches through a telephone quitline was effective in inducing a large number of smokers to make a quit attempt and stop smoking, above and beyond the efficacy of the quitline support alone.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effectiveness of a free nicotine patch giveaway program offered to New York City (NYC) smokers conducted in 2003. METHODOLOGY: The effectiveness of the program was assessed by contrasting the 12-month quit rate of program participants with the quit rate from a group of Quitline callers who were not offered free nicotine patches. The follow-up surveys were conducted in 2004 and the analysis in 2005. RESULTS: The 7-day nonsmoking prevalence rate measured at 12 months among callers who received the nicotine patches was 1.78 times higher (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.19-2.66) than the quit rate among a comparable group of callers to the Quitline from NYC a year earlier who did not receive nicotine patches. CONCLUSIONS: The provision of free nicotine patches through a telephone quitline was effective in inducing a large number of smokers to make a quit attempt and stop smoking, above and beyond the efficacy of the quitline support alone.
Authors: Maria Ramos; Joana Ripoll; Teresa Estrades; Isabel Socias; Antonia Fe; Rosa Duro; Maria José González; Margarita Servera Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-02-23 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Jack F Hollis; Timothy A McAfee; Jeffrey L Fellows; Susan M Zbikowski; Michael Stark; Karen Riedlinger Journal: Tob Control Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: David B Buller; Ron Borland; Erwin P Bettinghaus; James H Shane; Donald E Zimmerman Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Smita Pakhale; Justine Baron; Michael A Armstrong; Avanti Garde; Robert D Reid; Gonzalo Alvarez; Debbie Aitken; Kerri-Anne Mullen; George Wells; Andrew Pipe Journal: Can Respir J Date: 2015-02-03 Impact factor: 2.409