Literature DB >> 16829235

Nontherapeutic research with children: the Ramsey versus McCormick debate.

Albert R Jonsen1.   

Abstract

The ethical debates about use of children as research subjects are stimulated by reports of actual events. These reports often distort the essential ethical arguments about how and when use of children can be justified. The essential arguments were clearly formulated in an historic debate between two ethicists, Paul Ramsey and Richard McCormick. Their debate laid the foundations for the recommendations of the National Commission for Protection of Human Subjects that have become the current federal regulations governing research with children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16829235     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.04.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  4 in total

1.  British and Canadian views on the ethics of paediatric clinical trials.

Authors:  H M Sammons; J Malhotra; I Choonara; D S Sitar; D Matsui; M J Rieder
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Reopening old divisions.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 11.229

3.  Minimal Risk in Pediatric Research: A Philosophical Review and Reconsideration.

Authors:  John Rossi; Robert M Nelson
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Engaging children in genomics research: decoding the meaning of assent in research.

Authors:  Benjamin S Wilfond; Douglas S Diekema
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 8.822

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.