Literature DB >> 16828436

Distal embolic protection during renal artery angioplasty and stenting.

Matthew S Edwards1, Brandon L Craven, Jeanette Stafford, Timothy E Craven, Kenneth J Sauve, Juan Ayerdi, Randolph L Geary, Kimberley J Hansen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous renal artery angioplasty and/or stenting (RA-PTAS) is increasingly being used as an alternative to surgery for renal artery revascularization. Unfortunately, renal function responses after RA-PTAS appear to be inferior to those observed after surgical revascularization both in terms of improving and preventing deterioration of renal function postintervention. Atheroembolism during RA-PTAS has been postulated as a potential cause for the disparate results. Strategies to limit the occurrence of atheroembolism, such as the use of distal embolic protection (DEP) systems, may result in improved outcomes after RA-PTAS.
METHODS: All RA-PTAS procedures performed with DEP (using a commercially available temporary balloon occlusion and aspiration catheter) between October 2003 and July 2005 were reviewed. Glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was estimated preintervention and 4 to 6 weeks postintervention using the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula. Renal function and hypertension response rates as well as procedural data were classified and reported according to American Heart Association guidelines. Renal function improvement and deterioration were defined as a 20% increase and decrease in eGFR, respectively, compared with preoperative values. Continuous and categoric data were analyzed using paired t tests and repeated measures linear models.
RESULTS: DEP was used in 32 RA-PTAS procedures in 15 women and 11 men with a mean age of 71 years. All patients were hypertensive, 24 (92%) had renal insufficiency, and the mean preintervention degree of renal artery stenosis was 79%. Immediate technical success was achieved in 100% of RA-PTAS cases. Mean pre- and postintervention serum creatinine and eGFR values were 1.9 vs 1.6 mg/dL (P < .001) and 37 vs 43 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (P < .001), respectively. Renal function was defined as improved after 17 (53%) of 32 procedures and worsened in none (0%).
CONCLUSIONS: RA-PTAS using DEP resulted in 4- to 6-week postintervention renal function results approximating those of surgical revascularization. These data suggest that DEP use may prevent renal function harm during RA-PTAS as a result of atheroembolism and warrant further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16828436     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  9 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes in patients with renal artery stenosis treated with stent placement with embolic protection compared with those treated with stent alone.

Authors:  Ankaj Khosla; Sanjay Misra; Eddie L Greene; Axel Pflueger; Steve C Textor; Haraldur Bjarnason; Michael A McKusick
Journal:  Vasc Endovascular Surg       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 1.089

2.  Embolic protection device use in renal artery stent placement.

Authors:  Mallik R Thatipelli; Sanjay Misra; Srinivas R Sanikommu; Robert M Schainfeld; Sandeep K Sharma; Peter A Soukas
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 3.  Renal artery stenosis: optimizing diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  William R Colyer; Ehab Eltahawy; Christopher J Cooper
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.194

4.  The current state of endovascular therapy in the evaluation and management of renovascular disease.

Authors:  Praveen R Anchala; Scott A Resnick
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  Management of renal artery stenosis: 2010.

Authors:  William R Colyer; Christopher J Cooper
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2011-04

6.  Restenosis after renal artery angioplasty and stenting: incidence and risk factors.

Authors:  Matthew A Corriere; Matthew S Edwards; Jeffrey D Pearce; Jeanette S Andrews; Randolph L Geary; Kimberley J Hansen
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 7.  Diagnosis and management of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: improving patient selection and outcomes.

Authors:  Christopher J White; Jeffrey W Olin
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2009-03

Review 8.  Interventional radiologic techniques for screening, diagnosis and treatment of patients with renal artery stenosis.

Authors:  Richard H Marshall; Marc H Schiffman; Ronald S Winokur; Adam D Talenfeld; David N Siegel
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 9.  Renal Artery Stenosis: Optimal Therapy and Indications for Revascularization.

Authors:  Sandeep M Patel; Jun Li; Sahil A Parikh
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.931

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.