Literature DB >> 16828184

Development of a novel amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) typing method for enterococci isolates from cattle faeces and evaluation of the single versus pooled faecal sampling approach.

M M Burtscher1, K E Köllner, R Sommer, K Keiblinger, A H Farnleitner, R L Mach.   

Abstract

A novel and highly reproducible amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) typing approach was developed for typing of Enterococcus strains from the environment. Pooled and corresponding single faecal sample isolates were analysed to test the efficiency and coverage of dominant isolates for future sampling procedures. AFLP development was based on the selection of appropriate restriction enzymes and the design of adaptors and primers which was supported by in silico optimisation of selective bases using Enterococcus spp. genome data. Three optimal combinations of selective bases at the 3' end of the designed primers (i.e., CC, GG, CG) could be determined. AFLP fragment analysis using a capillary sequencer and intralane standardisation resulted in excellent methodical stability (> or =98% similarity for GG and > or =94% similarity for CC). Furthermore, the developed typing method was evaluated on 16 type trains of the genera Enterococcus and Streptococcus and 398 faecal isolates of cow pats from five alpine pastures in a karstic catchment area. Statistical analysis revealed a discrimination capacity of DI > or =0.95 (Simpson Diversity Index) and a reproducibility level of > or =94% similarity indicating the methods high typing capacity and robustness. Results of the comparative analysis of single and pooled faecal samples indicate that for a "strain to strain" based faecal source tracking, pooled faecal samples rather than single faecal samples are likely to be the most efficient sampling strategy for collecting the abundant corresponding strains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16828184     DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2006.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Methods        ISSN: 0167-7012            Impact factor:   2.363


  6 in total

1.  Escherichia coli and enterococci are sensitive and reliable indicators for human, livestock and wildlife faecal pollution in alpine mountainous water resources.

Authors:  A H Farnleitner; G Ryzinska-Paier; G H Reischer; M M Burtscher; S Knetsch; A K T Kirschner; T Dirnböck; G Kuschnig; R L Mach; R Sommer
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 3.772

2.  A trilocus sequence typing scheme for hospital epidemiology and subspecies differentiation of an important nosocomial pathogen, Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  Shahreen A Chowdhury; Cesar A Arias; Sreedhar R Nallapareddy; Jinnethe Reyes; Rob J L Willems; Barbara E Murray
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Hypothesis-driven approach for the identification of fecal pollution sources in water resources.

Authors:  G H Reischer; D Kollanur; J Vierheilig; C Wehrspaun; R L Mach; R Sommer; H Stadler; A H Farnleitner
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 4.  Does Soil Contribute to the Human Gut Microbiome?

Authors:  Winfried E H Blum; Sophie Zechmeister-Boltenstern; Katharina M Keiblinger
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2019-08-23

5.  Quantitative microbial faecal source tracking with sampling guided by hydrological catchment dynamics.

Authors:  G H Reischer; J M Haider; R Sommer; H Stadler; K M Keiblinger; R Hornek; W Zerobin; R L Mach; A H Farnleitner
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 5.491

6.  Multiple approaches to microbial source tracking in tropical northern Australia.

Authors:  Matthew Neave; Heidi Luter; Anna Padovan; Simon Townsend; Xavier Schobben; Karen Gibb
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.139

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.