Literature DB >> 16828183

Herd-level risk factors for Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica in U.S. market pigs.

P B Bahnson1, P J Fedorka-Cray, S R Ladely, N E Mateus-Pinilla.   

Abstract

Midwest U.S. herds (n=63) were studied to identify risk factors for harboring Salmonella enterica among slaughter-weight pigs. Samples collected on farms (feces) and at slaughter (distal colonic content, cecal content and ileocolic lymph nodes) were cultured using conventional means. Approximately 15 pigs were studied per herd, for a total of 3754 samples. The proportion of pigs positive in one or more samples was calculated for each herd. Herd characteristics were described by a combination of interview and written survey. Logistic regression was used to detect relationships between the detection of Salmonella and potential herd-level risk factors. The mean individual pig prevalence was 5% for feces, 4% for distal colonic content, 15% for ileocolic lymph nodes, and 17% for cecal contents. One or more Salmonella isolates were detected in at least one sample type in every herd. The five most common serovars were S. Agona, S. Derby, S. Schwarzengrund, S. Typhimurium and S. Senftenberg, with 25 additional serovars detected. Salmonella prevalence estimates were positively correlated among all samples except distal colonic content and ileocolic lymph nodes. Pigs with culture positive fecal samples were at increased odds of being detected positive for each of the slaughter-collected samples examined, namely distal colonic content (OR=30.5), ileocolic lymph nodes (OR=12.9) and cecal content (OR=23.2). Herds with positive fecal sample(s) had increased odds of having positive cecal content (OR>1.5), distal colonic content (OR=15.3) and ileocolic lymph nodes (OR=12.7). Pigs from herds with at least some bowl drinkers had eight-fold higher odds of testing Salmonella positive than did pigs from herds with only nipple drinkers. Pigs from herds with only dry feeders had five-fold higher odds of testing Salmonella positive when compared with pigs from herds with combinations of wet/dry style feeders. Interventions at these two points should be considered when designing growing pig facilities to reduce Salmonella shedding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16828183     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2006.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  10 in total

1.  Non-diarrhoeic pigs as source of highly virulent and multidrug-resistant non-typhoidal Salmonella.

Authors:  Nagappa Karabasanavar; G K Sivaraman; Satheesha S P; Archana S Nair; Ardhra Vijayan; Vineeth Rajan; Girish P S
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 2.214

2.  Salmonella fecal shedding and immune responses are dose- and serotype- dependent in pigs.

Authors:  Renata Ivanek; Julia Österberg; Raju Gautam; Susanna Sternberg Lewerin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Animal contact as a source of human non-typhoidal salmonellosis.

Authors:  Karin Hoelzer; Andrea Isabel Moreno Switt; Martin Wiedmann
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 3.683

4.  Longitudinal study of Salmonella shedding in naturally infected finishing pigs.

Authors:  A F A Pires; J A Funk; C A Bolin
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 4.434

5.  Evaluation of an enhanced cleaning and disinfection protocol in Salmonella contaminated pig holdings in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Francesca Martelli; Mark Lambert; Paul Butt; Tanya Cheney; Fabrizio Antonio Tatone; Rebecca Callaby; André Rabie; Rebecca J Gosling; Steve Fordon; Graham Crocker; Robert H Davies; Richard Piers Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Salmonella Typhimurium environmental reduction in a farrow-to-finish pig herd using a live attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium vaccine.

Authors:  Peter van der Wolf; Maaike Meijerink; Emile Libbrecht; Gerrit Tacken; Emile Gijsen; Kathrin Lillie-Jaschniski; Verena Schüller
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2021-07-23

7.  Assessing risk profiles for Salmonella serotypes in breeding pig operations in Portugal using a Bayesian hierarchical model.

Authors:  Carla Correia-Gomes; Theodoros Economou; Denisa Mendonça; Madalena Vieira-Pinto; João Niza-Ribeiro
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  Managing variability in decision making in swine growing-finishing units.

Authors:  Piero da Silva Agostini; Edgar Garcia Manzanilla; Carlos de Blas; Alan G Fahey; Caio Abercio da Silva; Josep Gasa
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 2.146

9.  Detection of Salmonella from animal sources in South Africa between 2007 and 2014.

Authors:  Awoke K Gelaw; Palesa Nthaba; Itumeleng Matle
Journal:  J S Afr Vet Assoc       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 1.474

Review 10.  Prevalence and risk factors for bacterial food-borne zoonotic hazards in slaughter pigs: a review.

Authors:  J Fosse; H Seegers; C Magras
Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 2.702

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.