Literature DB >> 1682794

Antineoplastic drug resistance in brain tumors.

P C Phillips1.   

Abstract

For all neoplasms, extraneural as well as brain, intrinsic, and acquired resistance to antineoplastic drugs constitutes a multifactorial problem. Much information has been generated concerning the individual mechanisms that play a role in drug resistance. The present decade will see a great deal of laboratory research emphasis in two related areas: (1) the molecular biology of resistance, including processes that regulate gene expression for critical detoxifying and transport proteins, and (2) further identification of DNA repair mechanisms in normal and neoplastic cells. In addition to continued research directed toward the identification of specific mechanisms, further study of the interrelationship between these mechanisms will be essential. Finally, there is a growing awareness that in vitro determination of the rank order of mechanisms contributing to resistance for a given drug may be quite different from that determined in vivo. The complexity of this problem is increased for brain tumors in that the understanding of the fundamentals of brain tumor biology is less advanced than for many of the systemic tumors. Ultimately, the identification of resistance mechanisms will lead to the development of clinically useful approaches to reverse cellular resistance and to increase drug sensitivity. Examples of such strategies that have or will find their way into clinical trial include: (1) use of buthionine sulfoximine to reverse glutathione-mediated resistance, (2) use of ethacrynic acid to reverse glutathione S-transferase-mediated resistance, and (3) use of calcium channel blockers and calmodulin inhibitors to reverse MDR. There will also be considerable emphasis on the rational modification of existing antineoplastic agents and the development of new drugs designed to circumvent important resistance mechanisms. For brain tumor treatment, additional strategies to circumvent intrinsic and acquired resistance by increasing drug delivery, such as high-dose chemotherapy with marrow or growth factor rescue and local drug delivery to brain tumors by drug-impregnated biodegradable polymers, will continue to be examined. Previous experience with efforts to augment antineoplastic drug cytotoxicity indicates that this process may decrease the margin of cytotoxicity between normal tissue and tumor, often referred to as the therapeutic index. To avoid serious neurotoxicity as a dose-limiting or treatment-limiting factor for potentially important clinical strategies to modulate drug resistance, it will be important to develop a greater understanding of the relative treatment sensitivities of brain capillary endothelium, glial cells, and neurons, as well as their individual abilities to transport, detoxify, and repair the effects of these drugs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1682794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Clin        ISSN: 0733-8619            Impact factor:   3.806


  11 in total

1.  Interstitial chemotherapy of experimental brain tumors: comparison of intratumoral injection versus polymeric controlled release.

Authors:  K G Buahin; H Brem
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Prognostic value of immunoexpression of the chemoresistance-related proteins in ependymomas: an analysis of 76 cases.

Authors:  A Korshunov; R Sycheva; V Timirgaz; A Golanov
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 3.  High dose chemotherapy for the treatment of malignant brain tumors.

Authors:  S H Petersdorf; R B Livingston
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 4.  Drug resistance in brain tumors.

Authors:  L G Feun; N Savaraj; H J Landy
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Myc down-regulation affects cyclin D1/cdk4 activity and induces apoptosis via Smac/Diablo pathway in an astrocytoma cell line.

Authors:  D Amendola; M De Salvo; R Marchese; C Verga Falzacappa; A Stigliano; E Carico; E Brunetti; M Moscarini; B Bucci
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 6.  Chemotherapy for medulloblastomas and primitive neuroectodermal tumors.

Authors:  B H Cohen; R J Packer
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 7.  Cellular immunotherapy for pediatric solid tumors.

Authors:  Meenakshi Hegde; Alexander J Moll; Tiara T Byrd; Chrystal U Louis; Nabil Ahmed
Journal:  Cytotherapy       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 5.414

Review 8.  Multidrug resistance in human cancer.

Authors:  M Lehnert
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Tissue distribution of methotrexate following administration as a solution and as a magnetic microsphere conjugate in rats bearing brain tumors.

Authors:  D Devineni; A Klein-Szanto; J M Gallo
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Nano-hole induction by nanodiamond and nanoplatinum liquid, DPV576, reverses multidrug resistance in human myeloid leukemia (HL60/AR).

Authors:  Alia Ghoneum; Shivani Sharma; James Gimzewski
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2013-07-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.