Literature DB >> 16827133

Molecular determinants of differential sensitivity to docetaxel and paclitaxel in human pediatric cancer models.

Elzbieta Izbicka1, David Campos, Jennifer Marty, Gilbert Carrizales, Gina Mangold, Anthony Tolcher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The differential sensitivity of some tumors to paclitaxel and docetaxel raises questions regarding the specific mechanisms responsible for the discrepant sensitivity to these taxanes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Docetaxel and paclitaxel were evaluated and compared at maximum tolerated doses (MTD) and 0.5 MTDs against the human pediatric tumor xenograft models SK-N-MC and IMR32 (neuroblastoma), RH1 and RH30 (rhabdomyosarcoma) and KHOS/NP (osteosarcoma), with 8-10 animals per group. The drug effects on the expression of the beta-tubulin isotypes, Bcl-2, Bax, Bcl-XL and proteomic profiles were evaluated by immunobloting and SELDI mass spectrometry in tumor xenografts dosed at 0.5 MTDs.
RESULTS: At MTDs, docetaxel was superior in neuroblastoma and osteosarcoma, while paclitaxel was more active in the rhabdomyosarcoma models. Docetaxel showed remarkable efficacy in KHOS/NP even at 0.5 MTD. The drugs had significantly different, yet highly heterogeneous effects on the tumor levels of betaI-tubulin (RH30), betaIII-tubulin (IMR32, KHOS/NP, RH]), Bax (IMR32, SK-N-MC) and Bcl-XL (KHOS/NP). In contrast, six protein species identified by proteomic profiling were consistently and differentially regulated by docetaxel and paclitaxel in all KHOS/NP xenografts.
CONCLUSION: Anticancer activity showed no apparent correlation with drug effects on beta-tubulin isotypes and apoptotic markers. The mass spectrometry approach has potential for the discovery of proteomic biomarkers for drug sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16827133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  5 in total

1.  Molecular Proteomic Characterization of a Pediatric Medulloblastoma Xenograft.

Authors:  George T Tsangaris; Konstantinos Dimas; Angeliki Malamou; Angeliki Katsafadou; Chrissa Papathanasiou; Dimitrios J Stravopodis; Constantinos E Vorgias; Maria Gazouli; Athanasios K Anagnostopoulos
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.069

2.  Application of proteomics to soft tissue sarcomas.

Authors:  Tadashi Kondo; Daisuke Kubota; Akira Kawai
Journal:  Int J Proteomics       Date:  2012-06-19

Review 3.  Preclinical profile of cabazitaxel.

Authors:  Patricia Vrignaud; Dorothée Semiond; Veronique Benning; Eric Beys; Hervé Bouchard; Sunil Gupta
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 4.162

4.  Exploring targeted therapy of osteosarcoma using proteomics data.

Authors:  Parunya Chaiyawat; Jongkolnee Settakorn; Apiruk Sangsin; Pimpisa Teeyakasem; Jeerawan Klangjorhor; Aungsumalee Soongkhaw; Dumnoensun Pruksakorn
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Distinct mechanistic activity profile of pralatrexate in comparison to other antifolates in in vitro and in vivo models of human cancers.

Authors:  E Izbicka; A Diaz; R Streeper; M Wick; D Campos; R Steffen; M Saunders
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 3.333

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.