Literature DB >> 16827017

Effect of cavity disinfection on postoperative sensitivity associated with amalgam restorations.

Wael M Al-Omari1, Qasem D Al-Omari, Ridwaan Omar.   

Abstract

This clinical study assessed the postoperative cold sensitivity reported by patients following the Class I and Class II amalgam restoration of primary carious lesions after different cavity treatments. One hundred and twenty patients, each with a previously untreated tooth requiring an amalgam restoration due to the presence of a carious lesion, were included. Sixty teeth had lesions that were radiographically judged to be located in the middle third of dentin, and another 60 were located in the inner third of dentin. Six different cavity treatment regimens were used: Group 1--no treatment; Group 2--calcium hydroxide liner (Life); Group 3--cavity varnish (Copalite); Group 4--resin modified glass ionomer liner (Vitrebond); Group 5--dentin adhesive resin liner (Single Bond); Group 6--chlorhexidine disinfectant (Consepsis). Patients were telephoned on days 2 and 7 postoperatively and asked whether they experienced sensitivity to cold, and if so, its duration and intensity. If sensitivity remained up to day 7, patients were also contacted on days 30 and 90. The Kruskal-Wallis test showed postoperative sensitivity to be significantly different among cavity treatments at days 2, 7 and 30 (p = 0.026, 0.044, 0.015, respectively). Lesion depth also affected postoperative sensitivity at day 2, with 27% of teeth with middle-third lesions producing pain, and 58% of those with lesions extending to the inner third producing pain (p = 0.000). This difference showed up at 7 and 30 days (p = 0.001, 0.015, respectively). Of the 51 teeth with sensitivity at day 2, 17 had mild pain, 26 were moderately painful and 8 had severe pain; each category reduced in degree of sensitivity and number with time. It would seem that medium-term (beyond 30 days) postoperative sensitivity is affected neither by the method of cavity treatment nor the depth of lesion, although, in the shorter-term, these factors do influence the postoperative sensitivity reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16827017     DOI: 10.2341/05-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  5 in total

1.  A randomized clinical trial of the effect of low-level laser therapy before composite placement on postoperative sensitivity in class V restorations.

Authors:  Horieh Moosavi; Fatemeh Maleknejad; Mahsa Sharifi; Farzaneh Ahrari
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  The effect of cavity disinfectants on the sealing ability of dentin bonding system: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Vivek Sharma; Mohan T Nainan; Vasundhara Shivanna
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2009-07

3.  A comparative evaluation of dentinal hypersensitivity and microleakage associated with composite restorations in cavities preconditioned with air abrasion - An ex vivo study.

Authors:  Ankit Arora; Shashi Rashmi Acharya; Saraswathi M Vidya; Padmaja Sharma
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2012-07

4.  The effect of bonding and surface sealant application on postoperative sensitivity from posterior composites.

Authors:  Neslihan Tekce; Mustafa Demirci; Sultan Aslıhan Gokturk; Safa Tuncer; Emre Ozel; Kansad Pala; Canan Baydemir
Journal:  J Istanb Univ Fac Dent       Date:  2015-10-21

5.  Direct and transdentinal (indirect) antibacterial activity of commercially available dental gel formulations against Streptococcus mutans.

Authors:  Tamer Tüzüner; Ayça Tuba Ulusoy; Ozgul Baygin; Gorkem Yahyaoglu; Ilkay Yalcin; Kurtulus Buruk; John Nicholson
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 1.927

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.