Literature DB >> 16826358

Proton therapy of uveal melanomas: intercomparison of MRI-based and conventional treatment planning.

Simone Marnitz1, Dino Cordini, Rolf Bendl, Arne-Jörn Lemke, Jens Heufelder, Ioannis Simiantonakis, Heinz Kluge, Nikolaos E Bechrakis, Michael H Foerster, Wolfgang Hinkelbein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Proton therapy for uveal melanoma provides high-conformal dose application to the target volume and, thus, an optimal saving of the organs at risk nearby. Treatment planning is done with the model-based treatment-planning system EYEPLAN. Tumor reconstruction is based only on a fundus composite, which often leads to an overestimation of the clinical target volume (CTV). The purpose was to exploit MRI on trial in a proton therapy-planning system by using the novel image-based treatment-planning system OCTOPUS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten patients with uveal melanomas received both a high-resolution planning CT and MRI of the eye. MR examinations were made with an eye coil. EYEPLAN requires eye geometry data for modeling, and tantalum marker clips for submillimeter positioning and additional information from ultrasound and 3-D imaging. By contrast, OCTOPUS provides the full integration of 3-D imaging (e. g., CT, MRI). CTVs were delineated in each slice. For all patients, CTVs (EYEPLAN vs. OCTOPUS) were compared intraindividually.
RESULTS: OCTOPUS planning led to a mean reduction of the target volume by a factor of 1.7 (T1-weighted [T1w]) and 2.2 (T2w) without compromising safety. The corresponding field size could be scaled down on average by a factor of 1.2 (T1w) and 1.4 (T2w), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Compared with the conventional EYEPLAN, MRI-based treatment planning of ocular tumors with OCTOPUS could be a powerful tool for reducing the CTV and, consequently, the treatment volume and the field size. This might be translated into a better patient compliance during treatment and a decreased late toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16826358     DOI: 10.1007/s00066-006-1512-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  9 in total

Review 1.  Myths and realities of range uncertainty.

Authors:  Antony John Lomax
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Ultrasonography and transillumination for uveal melanoma localisation in proton beam treatment planning.

Authors:  Jonathan E Lu; R Joel Welch; Kavita K Mishra; Inder K Daftari; Susanna S Park
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Impact of Adjuvant Ocular Interventions on the Quality of Life of Patients with Uveal Melanoma after Proton Beam Therapy.

Authors:  Johannes Gollrad; Christopher Rabsahl; Antonia M Joussen; Andrea Stroux; Volker Budach; Dirk Böhmer; Alexander Böker
Journal:  Ocul Oncol Pathol       Date:  2021-11-08

4.  Uveal melanoma: quantitative evaluation of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the response assessment after proton-beam therapy, long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Pietro Valerio Foti; Antonio Longo; Michele Reibaldi; Andrea Russo; Giuseppe Privitera; Corrado Spatola; Luigi Raffaele; Vincenzo Salamone; Renato Farina; Stefano Palmucci; Andrea Musumeci; Rosario Caltabiano; Marco Ragusa; Cesare Mariotti; Teresio Avitabile; Pietro Milone; Giovanni Carlo Ettorre
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Neoadjuvant proton beam irradiation vs. adjuvant ruthenium brachytherapy in transscleral resection of uveal melanoma.

Authors:  Alexander Böker; Daniel Pilger; Dino Cordini; Ira Seibel; Aline I Riechardt; Antonia M Joussen; Nikolaos E Bechrakis
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Three-dimensional MRI-based treatment planning approach for non-invasive ocular proton therapy.

Authors:  E Fleury; P Trnková; E Erdal; M Hassan; B Stoel; M Jaarma-Coes; G Luyten; J Herault; A Webb; J-W Beenakker; J-P Pignol; M Hoogeman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-01-17       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Quality of life and treatment-related burden during ocular proton therapy: a prospective trial of 131 patients with uveal melanoma.

Authors:  Johannes Gollrad; Christopher Rabsahl; Aline-Isabel Riechardt; Jens Heufelder; Andrea Stroux; Ute Goerling; Antonia Joussen; Volker Budach; Dirk Boehmer
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  An Automatic Framework to Create Patient-specific Eye Models From 3D Magnetic Resonance Images for Treatment Selection in Patients With Uveal Melanoma.

Authors:  Mohamed Kilany Hassan; Emmanuelle Fleury; Denis Shamonin; Lorna Grech Fonk; Marina Marinkovic; Myriam G Jaarsma-Coes; Gregorius P M Luyten; Andrew Webb; Jan-Willem Beenakker; Berend Stoel
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-04-03

9.  Clinical Outcomes after International Referral of Uveal Melanoma Patients for Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Marina Marinkovic; Lennart J Pors; Vincent van den Berg; Femke P Peters; Ann Schalenbourg; Leonidas Zografos; Alessia Pica; Jan Hrbacek; Sjoerd G Van Duinen; T H Khanh Vu; Jaco C Bleeker; Coen R N Rasch; Martine J Jager; Gregorius P M Luyten; Nanda Horeweg
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 6.639

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.