Literature DB >> 16826223

Deletion of chromosome 13 detected by conventional cytogenetics is a critical prognostic factor in myeloma.

L Chiecchio1, R K M Protheroe, A H Ibrahim, K L Cheung, C Rudduck, G P Dagrada, E D Cabanas, T Parker, M Nightingale, A Wechalekar, K H Orchard, C J Harrison, N C P Cross, G J Morgan, F M Ross.   

Abstract

In myeloma, the prognostic impact of different strategies used to detect chromosome 13 deletion (Delta13) remains controversial. To address this, we compared conventional cytogenetics and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) in a large multicenter study (n=794). The ability to obtain abnormal metaphases was associated with a poor prognosis, which was worse if Delta13, p53 deletion or t(4;14) was present, but only Delta13 remained significant on multivariate analysis. Patients with Delta13, by either cytogenetics or iFISH, had a poor prognosis. However, when cases with Delta13 detectable by both cytogenetics and iFISH were separated from those detected by iFISH only, the poor prognosis of iFISH-detectable Delta13 disappeared; their outcome matched that of patients with no detectable Delta13 (P=0.115). Addition of ploidy status to iFISH-Delta13 did not affect the prognostic value of the test. Indeed both cytogenetics and iFISH Delta13 divided both hyperdiploidy and nonhyperdiploidy into two groups with similar prognoses, indicating that the poor prognosis of ploidy is entirely due to its association with Delta13. We conclude that Delta13 detected by metaphase analysis is a critical prognostic factor in myeloma. Absence of Delta13, even in those patients yielding only normal or no metaphases, is associated with a relatively good prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16826223     DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


  51 in total

1.  Monosomy 13 in metaphase spreads is a predictor of poor long-term outcome after bortezomib plus dexamethasone treatment for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Miki Kiyota; Tsutomu Kobayashi; Shinichi Fuchida; Mio Yamamoto-Sugitani; Muneo Ohshiro; Yuji Shimura; Shinsuke Mizutani; Hisao Nagoshi; Nana Sasaki; Ryuko Nakayama; Yoshiaki Chinen; Natsumi Sakamoto; Hitoji Uchiyama; Yosuke Matsumoto; Shigeo Horiike; Chihiro Shimazaki; Junya Kuroda; Masafumi Taniwaki
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 2.490

2.  The t(14;20) is a poor prognostic factor in myeloma but is associated with long-term stable disease in monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance.

Authors:  Fiona M Ross; Laura Chiecchio; GianPaolo Dagrada; Rebecca K M Protheroe; David M Stockley; Christine J Harrison; Nicholas C P Cross; Alex J Szubert; Mark T Drayson; Gareth J Morgan
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 3.  From myeloma precursor disease to multiple myeloma: new diagnostic concepts and opportunities for early intervention.

Authors:  Ola Landgren; Robert A Kyle; S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Circulating microRNA expression is associated with genetic subtype and survival of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Jing-jing Huang; Juan Yu; Jiang-yan Li; Yao-ting Liu; Ren-qian Zhong
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 5.  Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM): novel biological insights and development of early treatment strategies.

Authors:  Neha Korde; Sigurdur Y Kristinsson; Ola Landgren
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Complex IGH rearrangements in multiple myeloma: Frequent detection discrepancies among three different probe sets.

Authors:  Gina Y Kim; Ana Gabrea; Yulia N Demchenko; Leif Bergsagel; Anna V Roschke; W Michael Kuehl
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  Management of newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma: updated Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) consensus guidelines.

Authors:  Shaji K Kumar; Joseph R Mikhael; Francis K Buadi; David Dingli; Angela Dispenzieri; Rafael Fonseca; Morie A Gertz; Philip R Greipp; Suzanne R Hayman; Robert A Kyle; Martha Q Lacy; John A Lust; Craig B Reeder; Vivek Roy; Stephen J Russell; Kristen E Detweiler Short; A Keith Stewart; Thomas E Witzig; Steven R Zeldenrust; Robert J Dalton; S Vincent Rajkumar; P Leif Bergsagel
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 8.  Treatment of myeloma: cure vs control.

Authors:  S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  Chromosomal lesions and uniparental disomy detected by SNP arrays in MDS, MDS/MPD, and MDS-derived AML.

Authors:  Lukasz P Gondek; Ramon Tiu; Christine L O'Keefe; Mikkael A Sekeres; Karl S Theil; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Close relation between 14q32/IGH translocations and chromosome 13 abnormalities in multiple myeloma: a high incidence of 11q13/CCND1 and 16q23/MAF.

Authors:  Madoka Takimoto; Kohei Ogawa; Yo Kato; Tasuku Saito; Takao Suzuki; Michiko Irei; Yasushi Shibuya; Yoshinori Suzuki; Masayuki Kato; Yasuyuki Inoue; Masatomo Takahashi; Hiroki Sugimori; Ikuo Miura
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 2.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.