Literature DB >> 16826059

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese Voice Handicap Index-10.

Paul K Y Lam1, Karen M Chan, W K Ho, Elaine Kwong, Edwin M Yiu, William I Wei.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Recent developments in voice assessment propose the use of quality of life measurements. The Voice Handicap Index (VHI) is one of the most psychometrically robust and well-studied instruments among the various instruments for measuring quality of life. Two versions of VHI (VHI-30 and VHI-10) have been shown to be valid instruments for distinguishing dysphonic from nondysphonic individuals and also for documenting treatment effect for dysphonic patients. The VHI has been used worldwide; however, the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of VHI remains untested. This study aimed to investigate such properties of the Chinese VHI-30 and VHI-10 in the Hong Kong Chinese population. STUDY
DESIGN: Psychometric analysis of the Chinese VHI-30 and VHI-10 in dysphonic patients and control subjects.
METHODS: The original VHI-30 was translated into Chinese and was completed by 131 dysphonic patients and 54 nondysphonic individuals. The dysphonic patients also self-rated their dysphonic severity.
RESULTS: Results showed high test-retest reliability and high item-total correlation for both Chinese VHI-30 and VHI-10. Both Chinese versions could be used to distinguish different dysphonic groups and between dysphonic and nondysphonic groups. Significant correlation was found between the VHI scores and the patients' self-rated dysphonic severity.
CONCLUSION: The present study supported the original three-factorial structures of the VHI-30 and the use of the VHI for the Chinese population. It is shown that the Chinese VHI-10 is a strong representation of VHI-30 and is recommended for use in clinics because of its validity and ease of use by patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16826059     DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000224539.41003.93

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  19 in total

1.  Validation and cultural modification of Arabic voice handicap index.

Authors:  Khalid H Malki; Tamer A Mesallam; Mohamed Farahat; Manal Bukhari; Thomas Murry
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Voice outcomes following radiation versus laser microsurgery for T1 glottic carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matthew T Greulich; Noah P Parker; Philip Lee; Albert L Merati; Stephanie Misono
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Long-term Surveillance Following Intralesional Steroid Injection for Benign Vocal Fold Lesions.

Authors:  Chi-Te Wang; Mei-Shu Lai; Po-Wen Cheng
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 6.223

4.  The Norwegian Voice Handicap Index (VHI-N) patient scores are dependent on voice-related disease group.

Authors:  Tom Karlsen; John-Helge Heimdal; Anne Rita Hella Grieg; Hans Jørgen Aarstad
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Translation and transcultural adaptation of the VHI-10 questionnaire: the VHI-10lb.

Authors:  Michel Khalaf; Nayla Matar
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  Voice-Related Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Systematic Review of Instrument Development and Validation.

Authors:  David O Francis; James J Daniero; Kristen L Hovis; Nila Sathe; Barbara Jacobson; David F Penson; Irene D Feurer; Melissa L McPheeters
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability of the Montenegrin 10-item Voice Handicap Index.

Authors:  Elvir Zvrko; Muhedin Kadić
Journal:  Arh Hig Rada Toksikol       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  Parkinson's disease patients with freezing of gait have more severe voice impairment than non-freezers during "ON state".

Authors:  Qian Yu; Xiaoya Zou; Fengying Quan; Zhaoying Dong; Huimei Yin; Jinjing Liu; Hongzhou Zuo; Jiaman Xu; Yu Han; Dezhi Zou; Yongming Li; Oumei Cheng
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.850

9.  Voice outcomes after laser surgery vs. radiotherapy of early glottic carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guangyuan Du; Chuan Liu; Wenbin Yu; Juan Li; Wei Li; Chengyuan Wang; Jiang Zhu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

10.  Treatment Outcomes and Adverse Events Following In-Office Angiolytic Laser With or Without Concurrent Polypectomy for Vocal Fold Polyps.

Authors:  Yu-Hsuan Lin; Chi-Te Wang; Feng-Chuan Lin; Li-Jen Liao; Wu-Chia Lo; Po-Wen Cheng
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 6.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.