STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study was conducted on the surgical procedures for lumbar disc herniation. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to investigate the surgical outcomes of different methods when performed by the same surgeon, using a prospective study. BACKGROUND: Macro discectomy is widely known as a common surgical procedure for lumbar disc herniation, while microdiscectomy in place of Caspar technique (the Caspar method) and microendoscopic discectomy by a posterior approach are reported as less invasive surgical methods for this condition. However, there have not been a significant number of prospective studies conducted to compare different surgical procedures for lumbar disc herniation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The target of our study was a group of 62 patients (male: 43, female: 19) who underwent surgery by macro discectomy (A group) and 57 patients (male: 33, female: 24) who underwent surgery by microdiscectomy in place of Caspar technique (B group). The mean ages at surgery were 34 (14 to 62) years and 41 (18 to 65) years respectively, and the mean duration of follow-up was 2 years and 8 months (12 months to 4 years). For all patients, the surgery was performed by 1 of the authors. The items investigated were the operation time, amount of bleeding, duration of hospitalization, amount of analgesic agent used after surgery, pre- and postoperative scores based on judgment criteria for treatment of lumbar spine disorders established by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, visual analog scales (VAS, 0 to 10) for lumbago before surgery and at discharge, VAS for sciatica before surgery and at discharge, perioperative complications, and cases requiring further surgery. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the 2 surgical procedures in the frequency of use of an analgesic agent after surgery, the pre- and postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores or postoperative VAS for sciatica. Statistically significant differences were observed in the operation time, amount of bleeding, duration of hospitalization, and postoperative VAS for lumbar pain, but the differences were not large, and may not have been clinically significant. CONCLUSIONS: For herniotomy for lumbar disc herniation, both macro discectomy and microdiscectomy are appropriate, as long as surgeons have mastery of the procedures.
RCT Entities:
STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study was conducted on the surgical procedures for lumbar disc herniation. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to investigate the surgical outcomes of different methods when performed by the same surgeon, using a prospective study. BACKGROUND: Macro discectomy is widely known as a common surgical procedure for lumbar disc herniation, while microdiscectomy in place of Caspar technique (the Caspar method) and microendoscopic discectomy by a posterior approach are reported as less invasive surgical methods for this condition. However, there have not been a significant number of prospective studies conducted to compare different surgical procedures for lumbar disc herniation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The target of our study was a group of 62 patients (male: 43, female: 19) who underwent surgery by macro discectomy (A group) and 57 patients (male: 33, female: 24) who underwent surgery by microdiscectomy in place of Caspar technique (B group). The mean ages at surgery were 34 (14 to 62) years and 41 (18 to 65) years respectively, and the mean duration of follow-up was 2 years and 8 months (12 months to 4 years). For all patients, the surgery was performed by 1 of the authors. The items investigated were the operation time, amount of bleeding, duration of hospitalization, amount of analgesic agent used after surgery, pre- and postoperative scores based on judgment criteria for treatment of lumbar spine disorders established by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, visual analog scales (VAS, 0 to 10) for lumbago before surgery and at discharge, VAS for sciatica before surgery and at discharge, perioperative complications, and cases requiring further surgery. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the 2 surgical procedures in the frequency of use of an analgesic agent after surgery, the pre- and postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores or postoperative VAS for sciatica. Statistically significant differences were observed in the operation time, amount of bleeding, duration of hospitalization, and postoperative VAS for lumbar pain, but the differences were not large, and may not have been clinically significant. CONCLUSIONS: For herniotomy for lumbar disc herniation, both macro discectomy and microdiscectomy are appropriate, as long as surgeons have mastery of the procedures.
Authors: Hormuzdiyar H Dasenbrock; Stephen P Juraschek; Lonni R Schultz; Timothy F Witham; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Ziya L Gokaslan; Ali Bydon Journal: J Neurosurg Spine Date: 2012-03-09