Literature DB >> 16826001

Postoperative change of the cross-sectional area of back musculature after 5 surgical procedures as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.

Takao Motosuneya1, Takashi Asazuma, Takashi Tsuji, Hironobu Watanabe, Yoshikazu Nakayama, Koichi Nemoto.   

Abstract

Many investigators have reported that persistent low back pain may occur after posterior surgical intervention, and studies have investigated the histologic and histochemical changes in back muscle after posterior lumbar spine surgery. The purpose of the current study is to compare the pre- and postoperative cross-sectional area of the back musculature among 5 surgical groups including anterior lumbar interbody fusion, which has no direct invasion of the back musculature, using magnetic resonance imaging, and to correlate the clinical results with the degree of atrophy. The cross-sectional area of the back musculature was measured before and after surgery in T2-weighted axial magnetic resonance images using a computer-linked digitizer. The degree of atrophy (atrophy ratio) was calculated as a ratio of the postoperative cross-sectional area to the preoperative cross-sectional area. Clinical results were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association's scores for the management of low back pain. Atrophy of the back musculature was confirmed in each group. However, no significant difference was seen in the atrophy ratio between the groups. Back musculature atrophy occurred even in anterior lumbar interbody fusion, which does not involve any direct surgery of the back muscle. A positive correlation was noted between the atrophy ratio and operation time only in posterior surgery, especially in nonfusion surgery. In conclusion, the current study suggests that a shorter operation time may minimize back muscle injury, and shows that factors inducing back musculature atrophy include not only direct invasion of the back muscle via a posterior approach, but also postoperative external fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16826001     DOI: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000211205.15997.06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  29 in total

Review 1.  Paradigm changes in spine surgery: evolution of minimally invasive techniques.

Authors:  Zachary A Smith; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 2.  Minimally invasive procedures on the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Branko Skovrlj; Jeffrey Gilligan; Holt S Cutler; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 1.337

3.  ALIF and total disc replacement versus 2-level circumferential fusion with TLIF: a prospective, randomized, clinical and radiological trial.

Authors:  Eike K Hoff; Patrick Strube; Matthias Pumberger; Robert K Zahn; Michael Putzier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Does pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar multifidus muscle predict clinical outcomes following lumbar spinal decompression for symptomatic spinal stenosis?

Authors:  Mario G T Zotti; F Vilas Boas; T Clifton; M Piche; W W Yoon; B J C Freeman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Comparative Study of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion via Unilateral and Bilateral Approaches in Patients with Unilateral Leg Symptoms.

Authors:  Ji-Hoon Seong; Jong-Won Lee; Ki-Young Kwon; Jong-Joo Rhee; Jin-Woo Hur; Hyun-Koo Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2011-10-31

6.  Cross-sectional area of human trunk paraspinal muscles before and after posterior lumbar surgery using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Mohammad S Ghiasi; Navid Arjmand; Aboulfazl Shirazi-Adl; Farzam Farahmand; Hassan Hashemi; Sahar Bagheri; Mahsa Valizadeh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Quantification of Multifidus Atrophy and Fatty Infiltration Following a Minimally Invasive Microdiscectomy.

Authors:  Ehsan Tabaraee; Junyoung Ahn; Daniel D Bohl; Frank M Phillips; Kern Singh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-06-26

8.  The quantitative analysis of back muscle degeneration after posterior lumbar fusion: comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open surgery.

Authors:  Sang-Hyuk Min; Myung-Ho Kim; Joong-Bae Seo; Jee-Young Lee; Dae-Hee Lee
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2009-12-31

9.  Quality of life and disability: can they be improved by active postoperative rehabilitation after spinal fusion surgery in patients with spondylolisthesis? A randomised controlled trial with 12-month follow-up.

Authors:  Outi Ilves; Arja Häkkinen; Joost Dekker; Liisa Pekkanen; Kirsi Piitulainen; Salme Järvenpää; Ilkka Marttinen; Kimmo Vihtonen; Marko H Neva
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Assessment of lumbar paraspinal muscle activation using fMRI BOLD imaging and T2 mapping.

Authors:  Yi-Long Huang; Jia-Long Zhou; Yuan-Ming Jiang; Zhen-Guang Zhang; Wei Zhao; Dan Han; Bo He
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.