Literature DB >> 16826000

A comparison of retraction pressure during anterior cervical plate surgery and cervical disc replacement: a cadaveric study.

P Justin Tortolani1, Bryan W Cunningham, Franco Vigna, Nianbin Hu, Candace M Zorn, Paul C McAfee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Dysphagia is a well-recognized complication after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, observed in as high as 50% of cases by videofluoroscopic evaluation postoperatively. Esophageal injury due to surgical retraction is a complication due to which swallowing difficulties may ensue. There are limited published data evaluating the effect of soft tissue retraction on intraesophageal pressures during anterior cervical instrumentation procedures.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to (a) measure the intraesophageal pressure secondary to retraction during anterior instrumentation, (b) determine whether any pressure differences exist between plating and cervical disc replacement, and (c) determine whether the surgical level or length of the plate influences the magnitude of intraesophageal pressure during retraction. STUDY
DESIGN: An analysis of soft tissue retraction pressure was performed for anterior single-level and 3-level cervical plating and cervical disc replacement procedures.
METHODS: Using a 4-cm transverse incision, a Smith-Robinson anterior approach to the cervical spine was performed on 7 fresh, frozen cadavers. The correct placement of an esophageal pressure-transducing catheter was confirmed by laryngoscopy, manual palpation of the esophagus, and fluoroscopic imaging. Three surgical instrumentation groups were used for comparisons: (a) single-level plate (b) single-level Porous Coated Motion cervical disc replacement, and (c) 3-level plate. Hand-held appendiceal retractors were used to retract the soft tissues during screw insertion into the plate and during application of the disc prosthesis into the interspace. Care was taken to exert just enough force on the retractors to allow the surgeon to move the desired implant into the correct position. In addition the individual performing the retraction was blinded to the procedure being performed-1-level plating, 3-level plating, or disk replacement. Fluoroscopy confirmed that the pressure sensors were directly behind the retractors during data acquisition.
RESULTS: Significantly greater intraesophageal pressures were demonstrated for single-level cervical plating at C5-6 compared to that at C3-4 (P=0.036). Similarly, significantly greater pressures were recorded at C5-6 versus C3-4 for the 3-level plating group (P<0.001). In contrast, there was no statistically significant difference in pressures observed during disk replacement at C5-6 compared to that at C3-4 (P=0.084). Significantly greater pressures were recorded during single-level plating compared to disc replacement at both C3-4 (P=0.016) and C5-6 (P=0.016). Three-level plating demonstrated significantly greater pressures at C5-6 compared to disk replacement (P<0.001) but no statistically significant difference compared to disk replacement at C3-4 (P=0.333). The highest mean pressure, 154.5+/-49.5 mm Hg, was recorded at C5-6 level during insertion of the 3-level plates.
CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the data presented here, anterior cervical plating results in significantly greater intraesophageal pressures when performed at C5-6 compared to C3-4. This holds regardless of whether the plate spans the distance from C3 to C6 (3-level plate) or the single C5-6 level. In addition, the insertion of the cervical disc replacement seems to require less esophageal retraction and hence reduced intraesophageal pressures when compared to anterior cervical plating.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16826000     DOI: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000210117.01897.ca

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  22 in total

1.  Hypopharyngeal Wall Exposure within the Surgical Field : The Role of Axial Rotation of the Thyroid Cartilage during Anterior Cervical Surgery.

Authors:  Byung Kwan Choi; Won Ho Cho; Chang Hwa Choi; Geun Sung Song; Choongrak Kim; Hak Jin Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-11-30

2.  Stand-alone anchored cage versus cage with plating for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled study with a 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Osamu Nemoto; Akira Kitada; Satoko Naitou; Atsuko Tachibana; Yuya Ito; Akira Fujikawa
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-10-05

3.  A comparison of a new zero-profile, stand-alone Fidji cervical cage and anterior cervical plate for single and multilevel ACDF: a minimum 2-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Zhonghai Li; Yantao Zhao; Jiaguang Tang; Dongfeng Ren; Jidong Guo; Huadong Wang; Li Li; Shuxun Hou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Zero-profile anchored cage reduces risk of postoperative dysphagia compared with cage with plate fixation after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  ShanWen Xiao; ZhuDe Liang; Wu Wei; JinPei Ning
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Anterior cervical interbody fusion with the Zero-P spacer: mid-term results of two-level fusion.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Chen; Huajing Chen; Peng Cao; Wen Yuan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Dysphagia associated with cervical spine and postural disorders.

Authors:  Soultana Papadopoulou; Georgios Exarchakos; Alexander Beris; Avraam Ploumis
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.438

7.  A new zero-profile implant for stand-alone anterior cervical interbody fusion.

Authors:  M Scholz; K J Schnake; A Pingel; R Hoffmann; F Kandziora
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Acute cervical epidural hematoma, screw pullout, and esophageal perforation after anterior cervical corpectomy surgery: report of a case.

Authors:  Ye Li; Qing-San Zhu; Jing-Chen Liu; Yun-Tao Wu
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-02

Review 9.  Zero-P: a new zero-profile cage-plate device for single and multilevel ACDF. A single institution series with four years maximum follow-up and review of the literature on zero-profile devices.

Authors:  Giuseppe M V Barbagallo; Dario Romano; Francesco Certo; Pietro Milone; Vincenzo Albanese
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Cervical disc arthroplasty: Pros and cons.

Authors:  Bradley Moatz; P Justin Tortolani
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.