Literature DB >> 16825853

Pay-for-performance in publicly financed healthcare: some international experience and considerations for Canada.

George H Pink1, Adalsteinn D Brown, Melanie L Studer, Kristin L Reiter, Peggy Leatt.   

Abstract

Recent reports in the United States and Canada provide evidence that healthcare systems routinely fail to deliver safe and high-quality healthcare services. Governments and other healthcare payers have begun to experiment with pay-for-performance programs that offer healthcare providers and organizations financial incentives for quality. The purpose of this paper is (1) to provide an overview of the design of major pay-for-performance programs in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia, with specific focus on government-sponsored programs, and (2) to articulate some considerations for potential implementation of pay-for-performance in Canada.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16825853     DOI: 10.12927/hcpap.2006.18260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthc Pap        ISSN: 1488-917X


  13 in total

1.  Pay for performance: learning about quality.

Authors:  Chaim M Bell; Wendy Levinson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Thinking about accountability.

Authors:  Raisa B Deber
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2014-09

Review 3.  Pay for performance: will dentistry follow?

Authors:  Andreea Voinea-Griffin; Jeffrey L Fellows; Donald B Rindal; Andrei Barasch; Gregg H Gilbert; Monika M Safford
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 4.  The breadth of primary care: a systematic literature review of its core dimensions.

Authors:  Dionne S Kringos; Wienke G W Boerma; Allen Hutchinson; Jouke van der Zee; Peter P Groenewegen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-03-13       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 5.  Pay for performance: is it the best way to improve control of hypertension?

Authors:  Tim Doran; Catherine Fullwood
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.369

6.  The Comparison of Models of Primary Care in Ontario (COMP-PC) study: methodology of a multifaceted cross-sectional practice-based study.

Authors:  Simone Dahrouge; William Hogg; Grant Russell; Robert Geneau; Elizabeth Kristjansson; Laura Muldoon; Sharon Johnston
Journal:  Open Med       Date:  2009-09-01

7.  An integrated approach to preventing cardiovascular disease: community-based approaches, health system initiatives, and public health policy.

Authors:  Tina Karwalajtys; Janusz Kaczorowski
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2010-09-06

8.  Incentive payments are not related to expected health gain in the pay for performance scheme for UK primary care: cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Robert Fleetcroft; Nicholas Steel; Richard Cookson; Simon Walker; Amanda Howe
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Creation of a synthetic indicator of quality of care as a clinical management standard in primary care.

Authors:  Ermengol Coma; Manel Ferran; Leonardo Méndez; Begoña Iglesias; Francesc Fina; Manuel Medina
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-02-13

10.  Impact of a pay-for-performance incentive on support for smoking cessation and on smoking prevalence among people with diabetes.

Authors:  Christopher Millett; Jeremy Gray; Sonia Saxena; Gopalakrishnan Netuveli; Azeem Majeed
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.