Literature DB >> 16825502

Comparison of the microsatellite instability analysis system and the Bethesda panel for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancers.

Kathleen M Murphy1, Shengle Zhang, Tanya Geiger, Michael J Hafez, Jeff Bacher, Karin D Berg, James R Eshleman.   

Abstract

Microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis of colorectal cancers is clinically useful to identify patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) caused by germline mutations of mismatch repair genes. MSI status may also predict cancer response/resistance to certain chemotherapies. We evaluated the MSI Analysis System (Promega Corp.; five mononucleotide and two pentanucleotide repeats) and compared the results to the Bethesda panel, which interrogates five microsatellite loci recommended by the 1997 National Cancer Institute-sponsored MSI workshop (three dinucleotide and two mononucleotide repeats). Thirty-four colorectal cancers were analyzed by both assays. The overall concordance between the two assays was 85% (29 of 34). There was complete concordance between the two assays for all of the MSI-high (11 of 11) and microsatellite stable (MSS; 18 of 18) cases. In the 11 MSI-high cases, all 5 of the mononucleotide loci in the MSI Analysis System demonstrated shifted alleles (100% sensitivity), and each shift resulted in products that were smaller in size than the germline alleles. All (5 of 5) of the cases interpreted as MSI-low by the Bethesda assay were interpreted as MSS by the MSI Analysis System. Our results suggest that the MSI Analysis System is generally superior and may help resolve cases of MSI-low into either MSI-high or MSS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16825502      PMCID: PMC1867601          DOI: 10.2353/jmoldx.2006.050092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  32 in total

Review 1.  Mismatch repair defects in human carcinogenesis.

Authors:  J R Eshleman; S D Markowitz
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  Clinical and pathological characteristics of sporadic colorectal carcinomas with DNA replication errors in microsatellite sequences.

Authors:  H Kim; J Jen; B Vogelstein; S R Hamilton
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Microsatellite instability in cancer of the proximal colon.

Authors:  S N Thibodeau; G Bren; D Schaid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-05-07       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Clues to the pathogenesis of familial colorectal cancer.

Authors:  L A Aaltonen; P Peltomäki; F S Leach; P Sistonen; L Pylkkänen; J P Mecklin; H Järvinen; S M Powell; J Jen; S R Hamilton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-05-07       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Somatic microsatellite mutations as molecular tumor clocks.

Authors:  D Shibata; W Navidi; R Salovaara; Z H Li; L A Aaltonen
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 53.440

6.  Tumor microsatellite-instability status as a predictor of benefit from fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Christine M Ribic; Daniel J Sargent; Malcolm J Moore; Stephen N Thibodeau; Amy J French; Richard M Goldberg; Stanley R Hamilton; Pierre Laurent-Puig; Robert Gryfe; Lois E Shepherd; Dongsheng Tu; Mark Redston; Steven Gallinger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Revised Bethesda Guidelines for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome) and microsatellite instability.

Authors:  Asad Umar; C Richard Boland; Jonathan P Terdiman; Sapna Syngal; Albert de la Chapelle; Josef Rüschoff; Richard Fishel; Noralane M Lindor; Lawrence J Burgart; Richard Hamelin; Stanley R Hamilton; Robert A Hiatt; Jeremy Jass; Annika Lindblom; Henry T Lynch; Païvi Peltomaki; Scott D Ramsey; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; Hans F A Vasen; Ernest T Hawk; J Carl Barrett; Andrew N Freedman; Sudhir Srivastava
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 8.  Microsatellite instability in inherited and sporadic neoplasms.

Authors:  J R Eshleman; S D Markowitz
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.645

9.  Better survival rates in patients with MLH1-associated hereditary colorectal cancer.

Authors:  R Sankila; L A Aaltonen; H J Järvinen; J P Mecklin
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Ubiquitous somatic mutations in simple repeated sequences reveal a new mechanism for colonic carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Y Ionov; M A Peinado; S Malkhosyan; D Shibata; M Perucho
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  92 in total

1.  Molecular analysis of Iranian colorectal cancer patients at risk for Lynch syndrome: a new molecular, clinicopathological feature.

Authors:  Mehrdad Zeinalian; Mohammad Hassan Emami; Rasoul Salehi; Azar Naimi; Mohammad Kazemi; Morteza Hashemzadeh-Chaleshtori
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2015-06

Review 2.  Molecular classification and correlates in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Shuji Ogino; Ajay Goel
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  Frameshift mutations of MUC15 gene in gastric and its regional heterogeneity in gastric and colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Hye Rim Oh; Chang Hyeok An; Nam Jin Yoo; Sug Hyung Lee
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.201

4.  USP9X, a Putative Tumor Suppressor Gene, Exhibits Frameshift Mutations in Colorectal Cancers.

Authors:  Yun Sol Jo; Min Sung Kim; Nam Jin Yoo; Sug Hyung Lee
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.201

5.  Tumor Type-Agnostic Treatment and the Future of Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Luis E Raez; Edgardo S Santos
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.493

6.  The germline MLH1 K618A variant and susceptibility to Lynch syndrome-associated tumors.

Authors:  Fabiola Medeiros; Noralane M Lindor; Fergus J Couch; W Edward Highsmith
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 5.568

7.  Classification and characterization of microsatellite instability across 18 cancer types.

Authors:  Ronald J Hause; Colin C Pritchard; Jay Shendure; Stephen J Salipante
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  Frameshift Mutations in the Mononucleotide Repeats of TAF1 and TAF1L Genes in Gastric and Colorectal Cancers with Regional Heterogeneity.

Authors:  Hye Rim Oh; Chang Hyeok An; Nam Jin Yoo; Sug Hyung Lee
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 3.201

9.  Intratumoral Heterogeneity of Frameshift Mutations in MECOM Gene is Frequent in Colorectal Cancers with High Microsatellite Instability.

Authors:  Eun Ji Choi; Min Sung Kim; Sang Yong Song; Nam Jin Yoo; Sug Hyung Lee
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.201

10.  PeakSeeker: a program for interpreting genotypes of mononucleotide repeats.

Authors:  James M Thompson; Stephen J Salipante
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2009-02-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.