Literature DB >> 16825462

Agricultural soil greenhouse gas emissions: a review of national inventory methods.

Erandathie Lokupitiya1, Keith Paustian.   

Abstract

Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) are required to submit national greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories, together with information on methods used in estimating their emissions. Currently agricultural activities contribute a significant portion (approximately 20%) of global anthropogenic GHG emissions, and agricultural soils have been identified as one of the main GHG source categories within the agricultural sector. However, compared to many other GHG sources, inventory methods for soils are relatively more complex and have been implemented only to varying degrees among member countries. This review summarizes and evaluates the methods used by Annex 1 countries in estimating CO2 and N2O emissions in agricultural soils. While most countries utilize the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) default methodology, several Annex 1 countries are developing more advanced methods that are tailored for specific country circumstances. Based on the latest national inventory reporting, about 56% of the Annex 1 countries use IPCC Tier 1 methods, about 26% use Tier 2 methods, and about 18% do not estimate or report N2O emissions from agricultural soils. More than 65% of the countries do not report CO2 emissions from the cultivation of mineral soils, organic soils, or liming, and only a handful of countries have used country-specific, Tier 3 methods. Tier 3 methods usually involve process-based models and detailed, geographically specific activity data. Such methods can provide more robust, accurate estimates of emissions and removals but require greater diligence in documentation, transparency, and uncertainty assessment to ensure comparability between countries. Availability of detailed, spatially explicit activity data is a major constraint to implementing higher tiered methods in many countries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16825462     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2005.0157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  7 in total

1.  Effects of winter cover crops straws incorporation on CH4 and N2O emission from double-cropping paddy fields in southern China.

Authors:  Hai-Ming Tang; Xiao-Ping Xiao; Wen-Guang Tang; Ke Wang; Ji-Min Sun; Wei-Yan Li; Guang-Li Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Trade-Offs between Economic and Environmental Impacts of Introducing Legumes into Cropping Systems.

Authors:  Moritz Reckling; Göran Bergkvist; Christine A Watson; Frederick L Stoddard; Peter M Zander; Robin L Walker; Aurelio Pristeri; Ion Toncea; Johann Bachinger
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 5.753

3.  Direct Nitrous Oxide Emissions From Tropical And Sub-Tropical Agricultural Systems - A Review And Modelling Of Emission Factors.

Authors:  Fabrizio Albanito; Ulrike Lebender; Thomas Cornulier; Tek B Sapkota; Frank Brentrup; Clare Stirling; Jon Hillier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Quantifying uncertainties in N(2)O emission due to N fertilizer application in cultivated areas.

Authors:  Aurore Philibert; Chantal Loyce; David Makowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Emissions of CH4 and N2O under different tillage systems from double-cropped paddy fields in Southern China.

Authors:  Hai-Lin Zhang; Xiao-Lin Bai; Jian-Fu Xue; Zhong-Du Chen; Hai-Ming Tang; Fu Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effects of winter covering crop residue incorporation on CH₄ and N₂O emission from double-cropped paddy fields in southern China.

Authors:  Haiming Tang; Xiaoping Xiao; Wenguang Tang; Ke Wang; Jimin Sun; Weiyan Li; Guangli Yang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Soil respiration from fields under three crop rotation treatments and three straw retention treatments.

Authors:  Dejie Kong; Nana Liu; Weiyu Wang; Kashif Akhtar; Na Li; Guangxin Ren; Yongzhong Feng; Gaihe Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.