Literature DB >> 16825071

Patient selection and surgical technique may reduce major complications of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

Jose Daniel Roman1.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To study the clinical outcome of patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy especially with regard to early postoperative complications.
DESIGN: Retrospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3).
SETTING: Private hospital in Hamilton, New Zealand. PATIENTS: Four hundred eighteen women. INTERVENTION: Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary indication for surgery, operating time, hospital stay, and major complications were analyzed. Major complications were defined as life-threatening injuries, unintended major surgical procedures, and conversions to laparotomy that occurred under duress (eg, intraoperative hemorrhage). Complications were reported up to 6 weeks of postoperative time. The total early postoperative complication rate was 11.24%. No patient had damage to the bowel, ureter, or bladder. There were no deaths. Major complications were three cases of partial vault dehiscence and one case of partial small bowel obstruction. The operation was performed successfully in 412 cases. Six patients needed laparotomy.
CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study shows that laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy is a safe surgical procedure. The possible reasons for the low complication rate reported are the surgical technique of ureteral dissection, the use of suitable instruments to expose the vaginal fornices, a consistent team approach, and the selection of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16825071     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  6 in total

1.  Causes and prevention of laparoscopic ureter injuries: an analysis of 31 cases during laparoscopic hysterectomy in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Petra F Janssen; Hans A M Brölmann; Judith A F Huirne
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Vaginal cuff dehiscence: risk factors and management.

Authors:  Beth Cronin; Vivian W Sung; Kristen A Matteson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Systematic review of urological injury during caesarean section and hysterectomy.

Authors:  Gavin Wei; Frances Harley; Michael O'Callaghan; James Adshead; Derek Hennessey; Ned Kinnear
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 1.932

4.  Electrosurgical Settings and Vaginal Cuff Complications.

Authors:  Megan L Lawlor; Rama Rao; Kelly J Manahan; John P Geisler
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2015 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Vaginal treatment of vaginal cuff dehiscence with visceral loop prolapse: a new challenge in reparative vaginal surgery?

Authors:  Salvatore Andrea Mastrolia; Edoardo Di Naro; Luca Maria Schonauer; Maria Teresa Loverro; Beatrice Indellicati; Mario Barnaba; Giuseppe Loverro
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-11-24

6.  Totally laparoscopic treatment of vaginal cuff dehiscence: A case report and systematic literature review.

Authors:  T Thomopoulos; G Zufferey
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2016-06-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.