Literature DB >> 16825042

Mid- to long-term outcome of disc excision in adolescent disc herniation.

Yossi Smorgick1, Yizhar Floman, Michael A Millgram, Yoram Anekstein, Ilya Pekarsky, Yigal Mirovsky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Adolescent disc herniation and its surgical treatment have been the subjects of many published clinical series. The majority of these series were heterogeneous; the number of adolescent patients (12-17 years) as opposed to young adults (18-20 years) was generally small and the length of follow-up varied greatly. Although the short-term outcome of disc excision in adolescents was mostly favorable, their long-term outcome is unknown.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the mid- and long-term results of discectomy in patients younger than 17 years of age. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective examination of a series of adolescent patients under the age of 17 years who underwent surgery for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. PATIENT SAMPLE: The medical records of 26 patients (15 males, 11 females, 12-17 years old [average 14.6]) who were operated for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation in three spine centers between 1984 and 2002 were reviewed. These subjects represented the total number of patients meeting the criteria of adolescents undergoing discectomy for lumbar disc herniation in these institutions during the study period. All patients were located and contacted by an independent observer not involved in the care of these patients. Low back pain associated with leg pain was the main clinical symptom in 20 patients (77%), leg pain in 4 (15%), and back pain in 2 (8%). They all underwent posterior disc excision: 23 (88%) patients had one level discectomy, and 3 (12%) had simultaneous discectomy at two levels. The L4-L5 interspace was involved 19 times, and the L5-S1 interspace 10 times. Slipped vertebral apophysis was diagnosed in 4 patients (15%). Twelve of the 26 patients (46%) had a first-degree relative with a history of lumbar disc herniation. OUTCOME MEASURES: Telephone interviews provided follow-up data for 26 patients. Results were classified as excellent, good, moderate, or poor according to current symptom status, the need for additional surgery, the Oswestry Disability Index, and back and leg pain scores.
RESULTS: The average time from surgery to follow-up was 8.9 years (range 3-21 years). At follow-up, the clinical results were excellent in 13 patients (50%), good in 4 (15%), moderate in 8 (31%), and poor in 1 (4%). Four subjects (15%) underwent a subsequent disc excision in the lumbar region, and one of them later underwent fusion.
CONCLUSIONS: Discectomy provides satisfactory clinical results in young patients with disc herniation. The rate of reintervention (15%) is comparable to that in adults, indicating that discectomy for young patients should be approached similarly to that in adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16825042     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  9 in total

1.  Percutaneous intradiscal aspiration of a lumbar vacuum disc herniation: a case report.

Authors:  Kevin I Pak; David C Hoffman; Richard J Herzog; Gregory E Lutz
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2010-08-04

2.  Surgical excision of the lumbar disc herniation in elementary school age.

Authors:  Youn-Soo Kim; Il-Jung Park; Kee-Won Rhyu; Sang-Uk Lee; Changhoon Jeong
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2009-06-30

3.  Pathophysiology of degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Yong-Soo Choi
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2009-06-30

Review 4.  A review of current treatment for lumbar disc herniation in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Lei Dang; Zhongjun Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  A review of current treatment of lumbar posterior ring apophysis fracture with lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Xueyuan Wu; Wei Ma; Heng Du; Kiran Gurung
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Slipped vertebral epiphysis (report of 2 cases).

Authors:  Majid Reza Farrokhi; Mohammad Sadegh Masoudi
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.852

7.  Factors Associated With Longer Postoperative Outpatient Follow-up Duration in Patients With Single Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Noncomplicated Patient Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yunsuk Her; Suk-Hyung Kang; Yong-Jun Cho; Jin Seo Yang; Jin Pyeong Jeon; Hyuk Jai Choi
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2018-08-29

8.  Clinical efficacy of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy in treating adolescent lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Qingning Li; Ziyu Li; Lei Chen; Dasheng Tian; Juehua Jing
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Adolescent prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc: Management strategies and outcome.

Authors:  Pragyan Sarma; Rajan Thanga Thirupathi; Dwarakanath Srinivas; Sampath Somanna
Journal:  J Pediatr Neurosci       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.