| Literature DB >> 16824219 |
Rita J Guerreiro1, Jose M Bras, Isabel Santana, Cristina Januario, Beatriz Santiago, Ana S Morgadinho, Maria H Ribeiro, John Hardy, Andrew Singleton, Catarina Oliveira.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pathological brain iron deposition has been implicated as a source of neurotoxic reactive oxygen species in Alzheimer (AD) and Parkinson diseases (PD). Iron metabolism is associated with the gene hemochromatosis (HFE Human genome nomenclature committee ID:4886), and mutations in HFE are a cause of the iron mismetabolism disease, hemochromatosis. Several reports have tested the association of HFE variants with neurodegenerative diseases, such as AD and PD with conflicting results.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16824219 PMCID: PMC1534050 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-6-24
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Neurol ISSN: 1471-2377 Impact factor: 2.474
Genotype frequencies for HFE mutations in controls, AD, PD and MCI patients
| C282Y | p | H63D | ||||||
| AA | GA | GG | GG | CG | CC | |||
| Controls (n = 115) | 0 | 5 (4.3%) | 110 (95.7%) | 2 (1.7%) | 39 (33.9%) | 74 (64.3%) | ||
| AD (n = 130) | 0 | 6 (4.6%) | 124 (95.4%) | 0.92 | 4 (3.1%) | 41 (31.5%) | 85 (65.4%) | 0.76 |
| MCI (n = 55) | 0 | 3 (5.5%) | 52 (94.5%) | 0.75 | 3 (5.6%) | 18 (33.3%) | 33 (61.1%) | 0.39 |
| PD (n = 132) | 0 | 18 (13.6%) | 114 (86.4%) | 0.01* | 5 (3.8%) | 38 (28.8%) | 89 (67.4%) | 0.47 |
*p < 0.05 (Statistically significant)
Allelic frequencies for HFE mutations in controls, AD, PD and MCI patients
| A | G | G | C | |||
| Controls (n = 115) | 5 (2.2%) | 225 (97.8%) | 43 (18.7%) | 187 (81.3%) | ||
| AD (n = 130) | 6 (2.3%) | 254 (97.7%) | 0.92 | 49 (18.8%) | 211 (81.2%) | 0.97 |
| MCI (n = 55) | 3 (2.7%) | 107 (97.3%) | 0.75 | 24 (22.2%) | 84 (77.8%) | 0.45 |
| PD (n = 132) | 18 (6.8%) | 246 (93.2%) | 0.01* | 48 (18.2%) | 216 (81.8%) | 0.88 |
*p < 0.05 (Statistically significant)
Figure 1Kaplan-Meier survival curves indicating the effect of H63D and C282Y mutations on age of AD onset. (A) There are no statistically significant differences in the age at onset of AD between wild type, heterozygous and homozygous patients for H63D mutation (χ2(2df) = 0.14, P = 0.93). (B) There are no statistically significant differences in the age at onset of the disease between wild type, heterozygous and homozygous patients for C282Y mutation (χ2(1df) = 3.08, P = 0.08).
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier survival curves indicating the effect of H63D (A) and C282Y (B) mutations on age of MCI onset. There are no statistically significant differences in the age at onset of MCI between wild type, heterozygous and homozygous patients for H63D mutation (χ2(2df) = 0.04, P = 0.98). (B) There are no statistically significant differences in the age at onset of MCI between wild type, heterozygous and homozygous patients for C282Y mutation (χ2(1df) = 0.10, P = 0.76).
Figure 3Kaplan-Meier survival curves indicating the effect of H63D and C282Y mutations on age of PD onset. (A) There are no statistically significant differences in the age at onset of PD between wild type, heterozygous and homozygous patients for H63D mutation (χ2(2df) = 2.4, P = 0.30). (B) There are no statistically significant differences in the age at onset of PD between wild type, heterozygous and homozygous patients for C282Y mutation (χ2(1df) = 1.66, P = 0.20).
Genotypes associated with C282Y and H63D in AD patients with (ApoE4+) and without (ApoE4-) ApoE4 allele
| C282Y | p | H63D | ||||||
| AA | GA | GG | GG | CG | CC | |||
| ApoE4(+) | 0 | 7.0% | 93.0% | 1.8% | 29.8% | 68.4% | ||
| ApoE4(-) | 0 | 2.9% | 97.1% | 0.25 | 2.9% | 31.4% | 65.7% | 0.90 |
Meta-analysis of the C282Y variation in the five published studies regarding Alzheimer's disease
| C282Y | |||||||
| wt/wt | wt/mut | mut/mut | wt/wt | wt/mut | mut/mut | ||
| Moalem, S. [22] | 23 (88.5%) | 3 (11.5%) | 0 | 87 (92.5%) | 7 (7.5%) | 0 | |
| Candore, G. [21] | 121 (98.4%) | 2 (1.6%) | 0 | 151 (99.3%) | 1 (0.7%) | 0 | |
| Berlin, D. [12] | 95 (95%) | 5 (5%) | 0 | 90 (90%) | 10 (10%) | 0 | |
| Sampietro, M. [24] | 103 (96.3%) | 4 (3.7%) | 0 | 95 (96%) | 4 (4%) | 0 | |
| Robson, KJ. [25] | 161 (84.3%) | 30 (15.7%) | 0 | 237 (88.1%) | 31 (11.5%) | 1 (0.4%) | |
| 503 | 44 | 0 | 660 | 53 | 1 | 0.63 | |
Meta-analysis of the H63D variation in the five published studies regarding Alzheimer's disease
| H63D | |||||||
| wt/wt | wt/mut | mut/mut | wt/wt | wt/mut | mut/mut | ||
| Moalem, S. [22] | 20 (76.9%) | 6 (23.1%) | 0 | 67 (72%) | 23 (24.8%) | 3 (3.2%) | |
| Candore, G. [21] | 94 (76.4%) | 24 (19.5%) | 5 (4.1%) | 122 (80.3%) | 26 (17.1%) | 4 (2.6%) | |
| Berlin, D. [12] | 67 (67%) | 29 (29%) | 4 (4%) | 66 (66%) | 30 (30%) | 4 (4%) | |
| Sampietro, M. [24] | 85 (79.4%) | 20 (18.7%) | 2 (1.9%) | 74 (74.7%) | 24 (24.3%) | 1 (1%) | |
| Robson, KJ. [25] | 138 (72.2%) | 50 (26.2%) | 3 (1.6%) | 194 (72.1%) | 67 (24.9%) | 8 (3%) | |
| 404 | 129 | 14 | 523 | 170 | 20 | 0.96 | |
Meta-analysis of the C282Y variation in the three published studies regarding Parkinson's disease
| C282Y | |||||||
| wt/wt | wt/mut | mut/mut | wt/wt | wt/mut | mut/mut | ||
| Dekker, M. [10] | 125 (91.2%) | 10 (7.3%) | 2 (1.5%) | 2616 (89.7%) | 290 (10%) | 8 (0.3%) | |
| Dekker, M. [10] | 54 (90%) | 6 (10%) | 0 | 2616 (89.7%) | 290 (10%) | 8 (0.3%) | |
| Buchanan, D. [11] | 391 (89.3%) | 46 (10.5%) | 1 (0.2%) | 405 (83.5%) | 76 (15.7%) | 4 (0.8%) | |
| Borie, C. [20] | 66 (93%) | 5 (7%) | 0 | 53 (91.4%) | 5 (8.6%) | 0 | |
| 636 | 67 | 3 | 3074 | 371 | 20 | 0.55 | |
Meta-analysis of the H63D variation in the two published studies regarding Parkinson's disease
| H63D | |||||||
| wt/wt | wt/mut | mut/mut | wt/wt | wt/mut | mut/mut | ||
| Dekker, M. [10] | 104 (76%) | 31 (22.6%) | 2 (1.4%) | 2185 (75%) | 661 (22.7%) | 68 (2.3%) | |
| Dekker, M. [10] | 44 (73.3%) | 16 (26.7%) | 0 | 2185 (75%) | 661 (22.7%) | 68 (2.3%) | |
| Borie, C. [20] | 42 (63.6%) | 23 (34.8%) | 1 (1.5%) | 39 (66.1%) | 20 (33.9%) | 0 | |
| 190 | 70 | 3 | 2224 | 681 | 68 | 0.21 | |