BACKGROUND AND AIM: Treatment of T1 colorectal carcinomas, either local excision including endoscopic polypectomy or radical surgery, has always been problematic in everyday practice. Although previous studies have revealed that tumor budding at the invasive margin can be a marker for the malignant potential of T1 colorectal carcinomas, the evaluation of tumor budding has not been standardized as yet. In the present study, we attempted to apply the actual number of tumor budding units for the individualization of treatment in T1 colorectal carcinomas. METHODS: In 76 T1 colorectal carcinomas, associations between lymph node metastasis and clinicopathological parameters were examined statistically. A mathematical formula for predicting the risk of lymph node metastasis was constructed and decision analysis was attempted to determine individually the indication for additional surgery after endoscopic mucosal resection of T1 colorectal carcinomas. RESULTS: Of the clinicopathological parameters examined, multivariate analysis showed that the actual number of tumor budding units alone was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis. The probability of lymph node metastasis was calculated as Z = 0.07 x (budding counts) - 3.726, probability = 1/1 + e(-Z). The more the budding counts, the higher the probability of lymph node metastasis. This formula was able to accurately predict lymph node metastasis in successive cases. The actual number of tumor budding units can be applied to decision analysis in determining an indication for additional surgery after endoscopic mucosal resection of T1 colorectal carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: The actual number of tumor budding units may be useful in the decision making for patient-oriented treatment of T1 colorectal carcinomas.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Treatment of T1 colorectal carcinomas, either local excision including endoscopic polypectomy or radical surgery, has always been problematic in everyday practice. Although previous studies have revealed that tumor budding at the invasive margin can be a marker for the malignant potential of T1 colorectal carcinomas, the evaluation of tumor budding has not been standardized as yet. In the present study, we attempted to apply the actual number of tumor budding units for the individualization of treatment in T1 colorectal carcinomas. METHODS: In 76 T1 colorectal carcinomas, associations between lymph node metastasis and clinicopathological parameters were examined statistically. A mathematical formula for predicting the risk of lymph node metastasis was constructed and decision analysis was attempted to determine individually the indication for additional surgery after endoscopic mucosal resection of T1 colorectal carcinomas. RESULTS: Of the clinicopathological parameters examined, multivariate analysis showed that the actual number of tumor budding units alone was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis. The probability of lymph node metastasis was calculated as Z = 0.07 x (budding counts) - 3.726, probability = 1/1 + e(-Z). The more the budding counts, the higher the probability of lymph node metastasis. This formula was able to accurately predict lymph node metastasis in successive cases. The actual number of tumor budding units can be applied to decision analysis in determining an indication for additional surgery after endoscopic mucosal resection of T1 colorectal carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: The actual number of tumor budding units may be useful in the decision making for patient-oriented treatment of T1 colorectal carcinomas.
Authors: Pascal G Doornebosch; Eliane Zeestraten; Eelco J R de Graaf; Pleun Hermsen; Imro Dawson; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Hans Morreau Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2011-10-13 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Sean C Glasgow; Joshua I S Bleier; Lawrence J Burgart; Charles O Finne; Ann C Lowry Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2012-01-19 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Michael S Landau; Steven M Hastings; Tyler J Foxwell; James D Luketich; Katie S Nason; Jon M Davison Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2014-04-25 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Chan Hyuk Park; Dong-Hoon Yang; Jong Wook Kim; Jie-Hyun Kim; Ji Hyun Kim; Yang Won Min; Si Hyung Lee; Jung Ho Bae; Hyunsoo Chung; Kee Don Choi; Jun Chul Park; Hyuk Lee; Min-Seob Kwak; Bun Kim; Hyun Jung Lee; Hye Seung Lee; Miyoung Choi; Dong-Ah Park; Jong Yeul Lee; Jeong-Sik Byeon; Chan Guk Park; Joo Young Cho; Soo Teik Lee; Hoon Jai Chun Journal: Intest Res Date: 2020-10-13