Literature DB >> 16823397

An investigation of dust lead sampling locations and children's blood lead levels.

Jonathan Wilson1, Sherry Dixon, Warren Galke, Patricia McLaine.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to provide guidance on where to collect dust lead wipe samples in homes to best characterize the risk of a resident child having a blood lead level at or above the CDC level of concern (10 microg/dl). In 1998, the Milwaukee Health Department enrolled 72 children living in pre-1950 buildings: 34 had elevated (i.e., > or = 10 microg/dl) blood lead levels (EBL); and 38 had non-elevated blood lead levels (non-EBL). This study explored dust lead sampling locations by examining loading differences between homes where children with EBL and non-EBL lived. Floor, windowsill, and window trough samples were collected in the living room, kitchen, bathroom, and child's bedroom and play area. Floor samples were collected at four locations: room entry; center of the room; under a window; and against the wall opposite the window (perimeter). Geometric mean floor dust lead levels were generally two to three times higher in homes of EBL children than homes of non-EBL children. Sampling the floor at the room entry or center is preferable to sampling under the window or from the perimeter of the room. When the central floor average was used, the room combinations that had the greatest differences between homes of EBL children and non-EBL children all included a sample from the child's bedroom and excluded the bathroom. When the entry floor average was used, the greatest differences also excluded bathrooms, but otherwise included a mix of all of the other rooms. Window samples did not distinguish where children with EBLs versus non-EBLs resided. This paper is based on Milwaukee alone, so generalizing results to other locations should be done with caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16823397     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jes.7500514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1559-0631            Impact factor:   5.563


  6 in total

1.  Development and field trial of a household surface lead loading rate sampling device in a lead-contaminated community of southern Thailand.

Authors:  Orrapan Untimanon; Alan Geater; Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong; Somkiat Thoumsang; Pia K Verkasalo; Wiyada Saetia
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Differences in metal concentration by particle size in house dust and soil.

Authors:  Paloma I Beamer; Christina A Elish; Denise J Roe; Miranda M Loh; David W Layton
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2012-01-16

3.  Impact of ferromanganese alloy plants on household dust manganese levels: implications for childhood exposure.

Authors:  E L Lucas; P Bertrand; S Guazzetti; F Donna; M Peli; T P Jursa; R Lucchini; D R Smith
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 6.498

4.  Migration of contaminated soil and airborne particulates to indoor dust.

Authors:  David W Layton; Paloma I Beamer
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Soil lead (Pb) in residential transects through Lubbock, Texas: a preliminary assessment.

Authors:  Ray W Brown; Chris Gonzales; Michael J Hooper; Andrew C Bayat; Ashley M Fornerette; Tobias J McBride; Thomas Longoria; Howard W Mielke
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.898

6.  Exposure of U.S. children to residential dust lead, 1999-2004: II. The contribution of lead-contaminated dust to children's blood lead levels.

Authors:  Sherry L Dixon; Joanna M Gaitens; David E Jacobs; Warren Strauss; Jyothi Nagaraja; Tim Pivetz; Jonathan W Wilson; Peter J Ashley
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.