Literature DB >> 16822749

Facultative adjustment of pre-fledging mass loss by nestling swifts preparing for flight.

Jonathan Wright1, Shai Markman, Shaun M Denney.   

Abstract

Nestling birds often maintain nutritional reserves to ensure continual growth during interruptions in parental provisioning. However, mass-dependent flight costs require the loss of excess mass before fledging. Here we test whether individual variable mass loss prior to fledging is controlled through facultative adjustments by nestlings, or whether it reflects physiologically inflexible developmental schedules. We show that in the face of natural and experimental variation in nestling body mass and wing length, swifts always achieve very similar wing loadings (body mass per wing area) prior to fledging, presumably because this represents the optimum for flight. Experimental weights (approx. 5% body mass) temporarily attached to nestlings caused additional reductions in mass, such that final wing loadings still matched those of control siblings. Experimental reductions in nestling wing length (approx. 5% trimmed from feather tips) resulted in similar additional mass reductions, allowing wing loadings at fledging to approach control levels. We suggest that nestlings may assess their body mass relative to wing area via wing flapping and special 'push-ups' (on the tips of extended wings) performed in the nest. Thus, by facultatively adjusting body mass, but not wing growth, nestling swifts are always able to fledge with aerodynamically appropriate wing loadings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16822749      PMCID: PMC1634777          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  4 in total

1.  Compensation for a bad start: grow now, pay later?

Authors:  N B. Metcalfe; P Monaghan
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 2.  Adaptation, constraint, and compromise in avian postnatal development.

Authors:  R E Ricklefs
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  1979-08

3.  The ecological costs of avian fat storage.

Authors:  M S Witter; I C Cuthill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1993-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Fledging in the common swift, Apus apusweight-watching with a difference

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.844

  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  Flexible growth and body mass predict physiological condition at fledging in the synchronously breeding European starling, Sturnus vulgaris.

Authors:  Joshua M Allen; Brett L Hodinka; Hannah M Hall; Kathryn M Leonard; Tony D Williams
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.653

2.  Factors affecting the duration of nestling period and fledging order in Tengmalm's owl (Aegolius funereus): effect of wing length and hatching sequence.

Authors:  Marek Kouba; Luděk Bartoš; Erkki Korpimäki; Markéta Zárybnická
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Physiological condition of juvenile wading birds in relation to multiple landscape stressors in the Florida Everglades: effects of hydrology, prey availability, and mercury bioaccumulation.

Authors:  Garth Herring; Collin A Eagles-Smith; Dale E Gawlik; James M Beerens; Joshua T Ackerman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Flight performance in the altricial zebra finch: Developmental effects and reproductive consequences.

Authors:  Ondi L Crino; Brett Klaassen van Oorschot; Kristen E Crandell; Creagh W Breuner; Bret W Tobalske
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.912

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.