Literature DB >> 16821238

Endovascular stent-grafts treatment in acute aortic dissection (type B): clinical outcomes during early, late, or chronic phases.

Shaoliang Chen1, Fei Yei, Ling Zhou, Jun Luo, Junjie Zhang, Shoujie Shan, Nailiang Tian, Tak W Kwan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This is a prospective study to evaluate the clinical outcomes of endovascular repair in patients with different phases of type B aortic dissection.
BACKGROUND: Endovascular repairing with stent-grafts is an innovative technique for type B acute aortic dissection. There is no previous study regarding outcomes in different time phases.
METHODS: Sixty-two patients underwent endovascular stent-grafts. There were 23 in the early phase (<24 hr), 20 in the late phase (>or=24 hr to 2 weeks), and 19 in the chronic phase (>2 weeks).
RESULTS: The early phase group had the lowest ratio of stent-grafts to patient and the shortest stent-graft length. The chronic phase group had the largest diameter of false lumen. The technical success rate was 100%; no patient died within hospital. Three patients died within 30 days, with the same death rate in every group. Compared with acute patients, the chronic group had a higher volume of contrast, a higher creatinine post-procedure, and a higher incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that creatinine and endoleak were independent factors in predicting late death (95% CI, 3.4-26%, P < 0.01). The overall cardiovascular event-free survival was 88.9% +/- 2.1% at 30 days, 87.2% +/- 4.1% at 1 year, and 81.4% +/- 6.3% at 2 years. CT angiography identified the complete or partial thrombosis of the false lumen to be 95.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular repairing with stent-graft is safe, feasible, and able to treat type B aortic dissection in all phases. However, chronic renal dysfunction was an independent factor which contributed to a lower survival rate of chronic phase patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16821238     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.20821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  6 in total

1.  Repair of Acute Type B Aortic Dissection Complicated by Aortic Rupture with Debranching Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair and Left Subclavian Artery Occlusion Using Amplatzer Vascular Plug II.

Authors:  Yasunori Iida; Tsutomu Ito; Sachiko Hayashi; Tatsuo Takahashi; Takahiko Misumi; Takashi Hachiya; Hideyuki Shimizu
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2015-06-15

Review 2.  Management of complicated and uncomplicated acute type B dissection. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Konstantinos G Moulakakis; Spyridon N Mylonas; Ilias Dalainas; John Kakisis; Thomas Kotsis; Christos D Liapis
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-05

3.  Placement of Endovascular Stent Graft in Acute Malperfusion Syndrome After Acute Type II Aortic Dissection.

Authors:  Shin-Ah Son; Young-Ok Lee; Gun Jik Kim; Joon-Yong Cho; Jong-Tae Lee
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.243

4.  Conservative management versus endovascular or open surgery in the spectrum of type B aortic dissection.

Authors:  Xun Yuan; Andreas Mitsis; Mohammed Ghonem; Ilias Iakovakis; Christoph A Nienaber
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-03-23

5.  Aortic remodelling after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute and subacute type B aortic dissection.

Authors:  Yi Zhou; Wei-Cheng Wang; Xiao-Ming Zhang; Cui Yang; Jing Zheng; Lin Yang; Ling Dong; Xiao Hu; Tao Zhu; Ya-Li Wang; Yan Yang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-05

6.  Comparison of long-term clinical outcome between patients with chronic versus acute type B aortic dissection treated by implantation of a stent graft: a single-center report.

Authors:  Shao-Liang Chen; Jian-Cheng Zhu; Xiao-Bo Li; Fei Ye; Jun-Jie Zhang; Zhi-Zhong Liu; Nai-Liang Tian; Song Lin; Cheng-Yu Lv
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 2.711

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.