Literature DB >> 16820634

Natural history and predictors of outcome in patients with concomitant functional mitral regurgitation at the time of aortic valve replacement.

Marc Ruel1, Varun Kapila, Joel Price, Alexander Kulik, Ian G Burwash, Thierry G Mesana.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concomitant functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) is frequently not corrected because it may improve after AVR; however, data supporting this assumption are sparse. We ascertained the impact of clinical and echocardiographic parameters on the outcome of patients with or without concomitant FMR at the time of AVR. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was performed on 848 patients who underwent AVR after 1990. Risk factors for mortality and a composite outcome of heart failure (CHF) symptoms, CHF death, or subsequent mitral repair or replacement, were examined with bootstrapped Cox proportional hazard models. Follow-up was 4591 patient-years (mean 5.4+/-3.4 years; maximum 14.2 years). FMR > or = 2+ had no independent adverse effect on survival in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) or insufficiency (AI). However, AS patients with FMR > or = 2+ and 1 additional risk factor (left atrial diameter >5 cm, preoperative peak aortic valve gradient <60 mm Hg, or atrial fibrillation) were at increased risk for the composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.7; P=0.004). AI patients with FMR > or = 2+ and a left ventricular end-systolic diameter <45 mm were also at risk (HR: 4.0; P=0.02). Clinical risk factors in the AS and AI subgroups were associated with an increased likelihood of mitral regurgitation > or = 2+ at 18 months postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: AS patients with FMR > or = 2+ and a left atrial diameter >5 cm, preoperative peak aortic valve gradient <60 mm Hg, or atrial fibrillation have a significantly higher risk of CHF and persistent mitral regurgitation after AVR than other AS patients. AI patients with FMR > or = 2+ and a left ventricular end-systolic diameter <45 mm preoperatively are also at increased risk. Others fare well after AVR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16820634     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.000976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  13 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary reviews by surgeon: timing of operation for chronic aortic regurgitation.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Taniguchi; Yoshiki Sawa
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-09-26

2.  Dynamics of Concomitant Functional Mitral Regurgitation in Patients with Aortic Stenosis Undergoing TAVI.

Authors:  Asife Sahinarslan; Francesco Vecchio; Philip MacCarthy; Rafal Dworakowski; Ranjit Deshpande; Olaf Wendler; Mark Monaghan
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.672

3.  Evaluation of mitral regurgitation by an integrated 2D echocardiographic approach in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  R Jansen; A M Wind; M J Cramer; F Nijhoff; P Agostoni; F Z Ramjankhan; W J Suyker; P R Stella; S A J Chamuleau
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  The effect of surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement on mitral annular anatomy.

Authors:  Mathieu Vergnat; Melissa M Levack; Benjamin M Jackson; Joseph E Bavaria; Howard C Herrmann; Albert T Cheung; Stuart J Weiss; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Changes in mitral annular geometry after aortic valve replacement: a three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic study.

Authors:  Feroze Mahmood; Haider J Warraich; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman; Tzong-Huei Chen; Peter Panzica; Andrew Maslow; Kamal Khabbaz
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2012-11

6.  Transseptal mitral valve replacement after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Laura D Flannery; Robert C Lowery; Xiumei Sun; Lowell Satler; Paul Corso; Augusto Pichard; Zuyue Wang
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2012

7.  Impact of Mitral Regurgitation on Clinical Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Authors:  Crochan J O'Sullivan; David Tüller; Rainer Zbinden; Franz R Eberli
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2016-05

Review 8.  Rare Cause of Severe Mitral Regurgitation after TAVI: Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Horațiu Moldovan; Bogdan-Ştefan Popescu; Elena Nechifor; Aida Badea; Irina Ciomaga; Claudia Nica; Ondin Zaharia; Daniela Gheorghiță; Marian Broască; Camelia Diaconu; Cătălina Parasca; Ovidiu Chioncel; Vlad Anton Iliescu
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.948

9.  The beneficial effects of TAVI in mitral insufficiency.

Authors:  Marco Fabio Costantino; Ernesta Dores; Pasquale Innelli; Antonella Matera; Vincenza Santillo; Roberto Violini; Rosario Fiorilli; GianGiuseppe Cappabianca; Nicola Marraudino; Eugenio Picano; Giandomenico Tarsia
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 2.062

10.  Impact of mitral geometry and global afterload on improvement of mitral regurgitation after trans-catheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Y Tayyareci; R Dworakowski; P Kogoj; J Reiken; C Kenny; P MacCarthy; O Wendler; M J Monaghan
Journal:  Echo Res Pract       Date:  2016-07-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.