Literature DB >> 16820559

The impact of the capability of circulating progenitor cell to differentiate on myocardial salvage in patients with primary acute myocardial infarction.

Yasushi Numaguchi1, Takahito Sone, Kenji Okumura, Masakazu Ishii, Yasuhiro Morita, Ryuji Kubota, Kazuhiko Yokouchi, Hajime Imai, Mitsunori Harada, Hiroyuki Osanai, Takahisa Kondo, Toyoaki Murohara.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are known to be involved in vasculogenesis and mobilized after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). To test the hypothesis that the angiogenic function of EPCs affects post-myocardial infarction (MI) myocardial salvage, we evaluated the number and potential differentiation of EPCs and compared these data with clinical parameters 6 months after MI. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Consecutive 51 patients (age, 61+/-8 years, mean+/-SD) with primary AMI who were successfully treated with stenting were enrolled. EPC identified as CD45low, CD34+, CD133+, and VEGFR2+ was quantified by a flow cytometry. The potential of EPCs to differentiate into endothelial cells (EPC differentiation) was also confirmed by the upregulation of CD31 and VEGFR2 after 7 days of culture. According to the proportion of EPC fraction, patients were divided into 2 groups (cut-off value=median). Although no difference was seen in myocardial damage shown by mean peak CK leakage and mean area at risk between the differentiated group (n=26) and nondifferentiated group (n=25), the number of attached cell was greater in differentiated group than in the nondifferentiated group (P=0.023). Left ventricular function and ischemic damaged area were assessed by scintigraphic images of (123)I-BMIPP in the acute phase and (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin in the chronic phase. We found that a greater increase in myocardial salvage (P=0.0091), decrease in end-systolic volume (P=0.012), and recovery of ejection fraction (P=0.011) occurred in the group with differentiated EPCs than in the nondifferentiated group.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with primary AMI, the capability of EPCs to differentiate influences the functional improvement and infarct size reduction, indicating that manipulation of EPCs could be a novel therapeutic target to salvage ischemic damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16820559     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.000588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  32 in total

Review 1.  Heart repair and stem cells.

Authors:  Linda W van Laake; Rutger Hassink; Pieter A Doevendans; Christine Mummery
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Effects of metformin plus gliclazide compared with metformin alone on circulating endothelial progenitor cell in type 2 diabetic patients.

Authors:  Lu-lu Chen; Yun-fei Liao; Tian-shu Zeng; Fan Yu; Hui-qing Li; Yong Feng
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Immunomodulatory function of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in experimental autoimmune type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Paolo Fiorina; Mollie Jurewicz; Andrea Augello; Andrea Vergani; Shirine Dada; Stefano La Rosa; Martin Selig; Jonathan Godwin; Kenneth Law; Claudia Placidi; R Neal Smith; Carlo Capella; Scott Rodig; Chaker N Adra; Mark Atkinson; Mohamed H Sayegh; Reza Abdi
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 4.  A comparison of stem cells for therapeutic use.

Authors:  Denis O Rodgerson; Alan G Harris
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 5.  Intrinsic Vascular Repair by Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Acute Coronary Syndromes: an Update Overview.

Authors:  Vânia Leal; Carlos Fontes Ribeiro; Bárbara Oliveiros; Natália António; Sónia Silva
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 6.  Therapeutic myocardial angiogenesis.

Authors:  Marie-Ange Renault; Douglas W Losordo
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 3.514

7.  Endothelial progenitor cells: what use for the cardiologist?

Authors:  Aurangzeb Siddique; Eduard Shantsila; Gregory Yh Lip; Chetan Varma
Journal:  J Angiogenes Res       Date:  2010-02-22

8.  Gender and Endothelial Progenitor Cell Number in Middle-Aged Adults.

Authors:  Brian L Stauffer; Owen J Maceneaney; Erich J Kushner; Jennifer N Cech; Jared J Greiner; Christian M Westby; Christopher A Desouza
Journal:  Artery Res       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 0.597

9.  Circulating endothelial progenitor cells in cerebrovascular disease.

Authors:  Keun-Hwa Jung; Jae-Kyu Roh
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 3.077

10.  Incidence, determinants, and prognostic value of reverse left ventricular remodelling after primary percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the Acute Myocardial Infarction Contrast Imaging (AMICI) multicenter study.

Authors:  Stefania Funaro; Giuseppe La Torre; Mariapina Madonna; Leonarda Galiuto; Antonio Scarà; Alessandra Labbadia; Emanuele Canali; Antonella Mattatelli; Francesco Fedele; Francesco Alessandrini; Filippo Crea; Luciano Agati
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.