Literature DB >> 16820387

Perceptions of parents on the participation of their infants in clinical research.

A Gammelgaard1, L E Knudsen, H Bisgaard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the motivations and perceptions of parents on the participation of their infants and young children in a comprehensive and invasive clinical research study.
METHODS: Semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with 23 mothers with asthma whose infants and young children were participating in the Copenhagen Prospective Study on Asthma in Childhood. The interviews were audiotaped, transcribed and analysed using the template analysis method.
RESULTS: Parents were motivated by altruism and by the opportunity to get their child checked regularly by medical experts to prevent the possible development of asthma. Parents found it very important that their children enjoyed their visits to the research clinic, and that they could withdraw from the study if their child started responding negatively to those visits. No apparent difference was seen in the attitude between the parents of children with lung or skin symptoms and those of healthy children.
CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to design and accomplish invasive clinical research on infants and young children in a manner that parents find ethically sound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16820387      PMCID: PMC2082979          DOI: 10.1136/adc.2006.096073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  17 in total

1.  Use of healthy children as volunteers in drug studies: the ethical debate.

Authors:  Gideon Koren; Gregory L Kearns; Michael Reed; Gerrard Pons
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  The ubiquity and utility of the therapeutic misconception.

Authors:  Rebecca Dresser
Journal:  Soc Philos Policy       Date:  2002

3.  Should children decide whether they are enrolled in nonbeneficial research?

Authors:  David Wendler; Seema Shah
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 11.229

Review 4.  Incorporating psychological approaches into routine paediatric venepuncture.

Authors:  A J A Duff
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 5.  Research in children.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Burns
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  The therapeutic misconception: informed consent in psychiatric research.

Authors:  P S Appelbaum; L H Roth; C Lidz
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  1982

7.  The Copenhagen Prospective Study on Asthma in Childhood (COPSAC): design, rationale, and baseline data from a longitudinal birth cohort study.

Authors:  Hans Bisgaard
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.347

8.  Factors influencing parental consent in pediatric clinical research.

Authors:  Justin D Rothmier; Mary V Lasley; Gail G Shapiro
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Participation in research: informed consent, motivation and influence.

Authors:  R M Hayman; B J Taylor; N S Peart; B C Galland; R M Sayers
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.954

10.  Child assent and parental permission in pediatric research.

Authors:  Wilma C Rossi; William Reynolds; Robert M Nelson
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2003
View more
  9 in total

1.  Attitudes of Mothers Regarding Willingness to Enroll Their Children in Research.

Authors:  Jane Paik Kim; Maryam Rostami; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  Parent perspectives on decisions to participate in a phase I hepatocyte transplant trial.

Authors:  Alexandra Dreyzin; Amber E Barnato; Kyle A Soltys; Coreen Farris; Rachel Sada; Kimberly Haberman; Ira J Fox
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2013-11-20

3.  Perceptions of academic health science research center personnel regarding informed consent processes and therapeutic misconception.

Authors:  Teresa W Atz; Robert M Sade; Pamela H Williams
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Parental comprehension of the benefits/risks of first-line randomised clinical trials in children with solid tumours: a two-stage cross-sectional interview study.

Authors:  Hélène Chappuy; Naim Bouazza; Veronique Minard-Colin; Catherine Patte; Laurence Brugières; Judith Landman-Parker; Anne Auvrignon; Dominique Davous; Hélène Pacquement; Daniel Orbach; Jean Marc Tréluyer; François Doz
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Reasons for participation in a child development study: Are cases with developmental diagnoses different from controls?

Authors:  Chyrise B Bradley; Amanda L Tapia; Carolyn G DiGuiseppi; Marti W Kepner; Joy M Kloetzer; Laura A Schieve; Lisa D Wiggins; Gayle C Windham; Julie L Daniels
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 3.103

6.  Deep phenotyping of the unselected COPSAC2010 birth cohort study.

Authors:  H Bisgaard; N H Vissing; C G Carson; A L Bischoff; N V Følsgaard; E Kreiner-Møller; B L K Chawes; J Stokholm; L Pedersen; E Bjarnadóttir; A H Thysen; E Nilsson; L J Mortensen; S F Olsen; S Schjørring; K A Krogfelt; L Lauritzen; S Brix; K Bønnelykke
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.018

7.  Sharing longitudinal, non-biological birth cohort data: a cross-sectional analysis of parent consent preferences.

Authors:  Kiran Pohar Manhas; Shawn X Dodd; Stacey Page; Nicole Letourneau; Carol E Adair; Xinjie Cui; Suzanne C Tough
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  How do parents experience being asked to enter a child in a randomised controlled trial?

Authors:  Valerie Shilling; Bridget Young
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  Participation in environmental health research by placenta donation - a perception study.

Authors:  Uffe Lind; Tina Mose; Lisbeth E Knudsen
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 5.984

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.