Ayal Schaffer1, Pamela Zuker, Anthony Levitt. 1. Mood Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. ayal.schaffer@sunnybrook.ca
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Uncertainty exists regarding the best approach for treating bipolar depression among patients already receiving a first-line mood stabilizer. The aim of this pilot study was to compare adding a second mood stabilizer or an antidepressant at this treatment decision point. METHODS: Twelve-week, randomized, double-blind pilot trial comparing the addition of lamotrigine or citalopram for bipolar depressed patients on mood stabilizer medication. Change in depressive symptoms and risk of switch were examined. RESULTS:Twenty subjects were randomized. Each treatment group experienced a significant mean reduction in total MADRS scores (citalopram Delta - 14.2, p=0.002; lamotrigine Delta - 13.3, p= 0.001), and there was no significant difference between treatment groups (p=0.78). Total response rates increased from 31.6% at week 6 to 52.6% at week 12. One out of ten patients in each group experienced a switch to hypomania. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size. Lack of a placebo arm. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this small trial suggest that both lamotrigine and citalopram appear to be reasonable choices as add-on acute treatment for bipolar depression, with response rates continuing to rise considerably past 6 weeks of treatment.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Uncertainty exists regarding the best approach for treating bipolar depression among patients already receiving a first-line mood stabilizer. The aim of this pilot study was to compare adding a second mood stabilizer or an antidepressant at this treatment decision point. METHODS: Twelve-week, randomized, double-blind pilot trial comparing the addition of lamotrigine or citalopram for bipolar depressedpatients on mood stabilizer medication. Change in depressive symptoms and risk of switch were examined. RESULTS: Twenty subjects were randomized. Each treatment group experienced a significant mean reduction in total MADRS scores (citalopram Delta - 14.2, p=0.002; lamotrigine Delta - 13.3, p= 0.001), and there was no significant difference between treatment groups (p=0.78). Total response rates increased from 31.6% at week 6 to 52.6% at week 12. One out of ten patients in each group experienced a switch to hypomania. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size. Lack of a placebo arm. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this small trial suggest that both lamotrigine and citalopram appear to be reasonable choices as add-on acute treatment for bipolar depression, with response rates continuing to rise considerably past 6 weeks of treatment.
Authors: William Berger; Mauro V Mendlowicz; Carla Marques-Portella; Gustavo Kinrys; Leonardo F Fontenelle; Charles R Marmar; Ivan Figueira Journal: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry Date: 2008-12-24 Impact factor: 5.067
Authors: Lucas Spanemberg; Raffael Massuda; Lucas Lovato; Leonardo Paim; Edgar Arrua Vares; Neusa Sica da Rocha; Keila Maria Mendes Ceresér Journal: Psychiatr Q Date: 2012-06
Authors: Konstantinos N Fountoulakis; Lakshmi Yatham; Heinz Grunze; Eduard Vieta; Allan Young; Pierre Blier; Siegfried Kasper; Hans Jurgen Moeller Journal: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 5.176
Authors: Thomas C Baghai; Pierre Blier; David S Baldwin; Michael Bauer; Guy M Goodwin; Kostas N Fountoulakis; Siegfried Kasper; Brian E Leonard; Ulrik F Malt; Dan Stein; Marcio Versiani; Hans-Jürgen Möller Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 5.270
Authors: Trisha Suppes; Lauren B Marangell; Ira H Bernstein; Dorothy I Kelly; E Grace Fischer; Holly A Zboyan; Diane E Snow; Melissa Martinez; Rayan Al Jurdi; Geetha Shivakumar; Suresh Sureddi; Robert Gonzalez Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2008-03-20 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Jodi M Gonzalez; Charles L Bowden; Martin M Katz; Peter Thompson; Vivek Singh; Thomas J Prihoda; Martha Dahl Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2008 Impact factor: 4.035