Literature DB >> 16819767

Feasibility study of the use of the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device for treatment of cardiogenic shock.

Daniel Burkhoff1, William O'Neill, Corinna Brunckhorst, Dustin Letts, David Lasorda, Howard A Cohen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The mortality of cardiogenic shock (CGS) remains high despite currently available pharmacological and mechanical treatment options. The standard of care in medically refractory situations has been the insertion of an intra-aortic balloon pump. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility, safety, and hemodynamic impact of the TandemHeart percutaneous left ventricular assist device (pVAD) in CGS.
METHODS: Thirteen patients from five centers in the US with the diagnosis of CGS were enrolled in the study. Hemodynamic measurements, including cardiac index (CI), mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), and central venous pressure (CVP) were performed presupport, during support and after device removal. Patients were monitored for 6 months.
RESULTS: The pVAD was successfully implanted in all 13 patients, with duration of support averaging 60 +/- 44 hr. During support, CI increased from 2.09 +/- 0.64 at baseline to 2.53 +/- 0.65 (P = 0.02), MAP increased from 70.6 +/- 11.1 to 81.7 +/- 14.6 (P = 0.01), PCWP decreased from 27.2 +/- 12.2 to 16.5 +/- 4.8 (P = 0.01), and CVP from 12.9 +/- 3.7 to 12.6 +/- 3.6 (P = NS). Ten patients survived to device explant, 6 of whom were bridged to another therapy. Seven patients survived to hospital discharge and were all alive at 6 months. The two most common adverse events were distal leg ischemia (n = 3) and bleeding from the cannulation site (n = 4).
CONCLUSION: The TandemHeart PTVA System may be a useful complementary treatment for patients with CGS, especially as a bridge to another treatment. Further study is needed to definitively establish safety and efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16819767     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.20796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  5 in total

Review 1.  Emergency cardiac surgery in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a review of the evidence and perioperative implications of medical and mechanical therapeutics.

Authors:  Charles Brown; Brijen Joshi; Nauder Faraday; Ashish Shah; David Yuh; Jeffrey J Rade; Charles W Hogue
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 2.  The evolution of temporary percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices: a review of the options and evidence in cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Freddy Abnousi; Celina Mei Yong; William Fearon; Dipanjan Banerjee
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  TandemHeart insertion via a femoral arterial GORE-TEX graft conduit in a high-risk patient.

Authors:  Jonas Busch; Guillermo Torre-Amione; George P Noon; Matthias Loebe
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2008

4.  Prognostic relevance of hemodialysis for short-term survival in patients after LVAD implantation.

Authors:  Bastian Schmack; Leonie Grossekettler; Alexander Weymann; Joel Schamroth; Anton Sabashnikov; Philip W Raake; Aron F Popov; Ashham Mansur; Matthias Karck; Vedat Schwenger; Arjang Ruhparwar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Prospective validation of the SCAI shock classification: Single center analysis.

Authors:  David A Baran; Ashleigh Long; Amit P Badiye; Kelly Stelling
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.