Literature DB >> 16819694

Revision total knee arthroplasty with the total condylar III system: a comparative analysis of 71 consecutive cases of osteoarthritis or inflammatory arthritis.

Pu-Yi Sheng1, Esa Jämsen, Matti Lehto, Jorma Pajamäki, Pekka Halonen, Yrjö T Konttinen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As revision total knee arthroplasty surgery is becoming more common, it is necessary to evaluate how individual revision prosthesis systems perform in degenerative and inflammatory arthritides. In this study, results of the use of the Total Condylar III (TC III) system in osteoarthritis (55 knees) were compared to results of its use in inflammatory arthritis (16).
METHODS: Patients were followed radiographically for 5.9 (3.0-10.2) years and clinically for 3.0 (0.2-6.8) years, using re-revision as the endpoint.
RESULTS: At 1 year after revision and at final follow-up, the total Knee Society knee score, function score and range of motion had improved (p < 0.001) with no differences between osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis. No knee had definite component loosening, although 23 knees had asymptomatic radiolucent lines. Complications comprised 4 infections, 1 patellar pain syndrome and 1 rupture of the patellar tendon. Using any re-revision of the prosthesis as the endpoint, 5-year survival was 95% and 8-year survival was 94%.
INTERPRETATION: Concentration of demanding revision knee arthroplasties to a few hands led to good or excellent knee joint knee score results in four-fifths of the patients, and showed good outcome with the TCIII system. In spite of ligamentous laxity, propensity to develop infections, bone destruction and poor general health, patients with inflammatory arthritis had results similar to those with osteoarthritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16819694     DOI: 10.1080/17453670610012520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop        ISSN: 1745-3674            Impact factor:   3.717


  6 in total

1.  Revision total knee arthroplasty for aseptic and septic causes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Ryan M Garcia; Brian T Hardy; Matthew J Kraay; Victor M Goldberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Revision total knee arthroplasty infection: incidence and predictors.

Authors:  S M Javad Mortazavi; Justin Schwartzenberger; Matthew S Austin; James J Purtill; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Outcome of knee revisions for osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis with postero-stabilized arthroplasties: a mean ten-year follow-up with 90 knee revisions.

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou; Arnaud Dubory; Damien Potage; François Roubineau; Charles Henri Flouzat-Lachaniette
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  2- to 9-year outcome of stemmed total knee arthroplasty. Similar failure rates in patients when used primary or as a revision.

Authors:  Rüdiger J Weiss; Martin Thorsell; André Stark; Josefina Nyvang; Margareta Hedström
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Antibiotic cement was associated with half the risk of re-revision in 1,154 aseptic revision total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Stefano A Bini; Priscilla H Chan; Maria C S Inacio; Elizabeth W Paxton; Monti Khatod
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Revision total knee arthroplasty: hybrid vs standard cemented fixation.

Authors:  Jesús Gómez-Vallejo; Jorge Albareda-Albareda; Belén Seral-García; Nieves Blanco-Rubio; Laura Ezquerra-Herrando
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-08-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.