UNLABELLED: Folic acid was linked regioselectively through its alpha- and gamma-carboxyl groups to 4-fluorobenzylamine (FBA), and the alpha- and gamma-FBA-folate regioisomers were evaluated for their ability to bind to folate receptor-positive cells. The 18F-labeled alpha/gamma-FBA-folate counterpart was examined for in vivo tumor targeting efficiency in nude mice bearing folate receptor-positive tumor cells. METHODS: 18F-alpha/gamma-FBA-folate was prepared in a 4-step reaction sequence starting from folic acid. The relative binding affinities of the alpha- and gamma-FBA-folates to the folate receptor with respect to parent folic acid were determined in cultured KB-31 cells (nasopharyngeal epidermal carcinoma cell line) overexpressing the folate receptor using 3H-folic acid. Tumor accumulation of the 18F-labeled alpha/gamma-FBA-folate and 18F-FDG was analyzed in vivo by high-resolution PET. Biodistribution and PET studies were performed under baseline and blockage conditions. RESULTS: The radiochemical yield of the coupling step ranged from 15% to 44%, and the maximum specific radioactivity was 24 GBq/micromol. The in vitro binding affinities of the alpha- and gamma-isomers and folic acid were 71, 62, and 41 nmol/L, respectively. PET revealed heterogeneous uptake of the radioligand, with the highest activity concentrations found in the tumor rim. In contrast, 18F-FDG uptake in a nude mouse bearing KB-31 folate receptor-positive tumors was negligible. Radioligand uptake in tumors at 125 min after injection amounted to 6.56% of the injected dose per gram of tissue (%ID/g) in control animals, whereas radioactivity accumulation in the tumors of folic acid-treated animals was significantly reduced by more than 80%-to 1.07 %ID/g (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: This new 18F-labeled folic acid derivative is a promising tool for PET imaging of folate receptor-positive tumors.
UNLABELLED: Folic acid was linked regioselectively through its alpha- and gamma-carboxyl groups to 4-fluorobenzylamine (FBA), and the alpha- and gamma-FBA-folate regioisomers were evaluated for their ability to bind to folate receptor-positive cells. The 18F-labeled alpha/gamma-FBA-folate counterpart was examined for in vivo tumor targeting efficiency in nude mice bearing folate receptor-positive tumor cells. METHODS: 18F-alpha/gamma-FBA-folate was prepared in a 4-step reaction sequence starting from folic acid. The relative binding affinities of the alpha- and gamma-FBA-folates to the folate receptor with respect to parent folic acid were determined in cultured KB-31 cells (nasopharyngeal epidermal carcinoma cell line) overexpressing the folate receptor using 3H-folic acid. Tumor accumulation of the 18F-labeled alpha/gamma-FBA-folate and 18F-FDG was analyzed in vivo by high-resolution PET. Biodistribution and PET studies were performed under baseline and blockage conditions. RESULTS: The radiochemical yield of the coupling step ranged from 15% to 44%, and the maximum specific radioactivity was 24 GBq/micromol. The in vitro binding affinities of the alpha- and gamma-isomers and folic acid were 71, 62, and 41 nmol/L, respectively. PET revealed heterogeneous uptake of the radioligand, with the highest activity concentrations found in the tumor rim. In contrast, 18F-FDG uptake in a nude mouse bearing KB-31 folate receptor-positive tumors was negligible. Radioligand uptake in tumors at 125 min after injection amounted to 6.56% of the injected dose per gram of tissue (%ID/g) in control animals, whereas radioactivity accumulation in the tumors of folic acid-treated animals was significantly reduced by more than 80%-to 1.07 %ID/g (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: This new 18F-labeled folic acid derivative is a promising tool for PET imaging of folate receptor-positive tumors.
Authors: Allen F Brooks; Lindsey R Drake; Megan N Stewart; Brian P Cary; Isaac M Jackson; Dale Mallette; Andrew V Mossine; Peter J H Scott Journal: Pharm Pat Anal Date: 2015-12-16
Authors: Tammy L Kalber; Nazila Kamaly; Po-Wah So; John A Pugh; Josephine Bunch; Cameron W McLeod; Michael R Jorgensen; Andrew D Miller; Jimmy D Bell Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Huan Meng; Min Xue; Tian Xia; Zhaoxia Ji; Derrick Y Tarn; Jeffrey I Zink; Andre E Nel Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2011-04-27 Impact factor: 15.881