Literature DB >> 16818711

Signaling via ErbB2 and ErbB3 associates with resistance and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification with sensitivity to EGFR inhibitor gefitinib in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells.

Kaisa Erjala1, Maria Sundvall, Teemu T Junttila, Na Zhang, Mika Savisalo, Pekka Mali, Jarmo Kulmala, Jaakko Pulkkinen, Reidar Grenman, Klaus Elenius.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor gefitinib (Iressa) has shown antitumor activity in clinical trials against cancers, such as non-small cell lung cancer and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Research on non-small cell lung cancer has elucidated factors that may predict response to gefitinib. Less is known about molecular markers that may predict response to gefitinib in HNSCC patients. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: We analyzed possible associations of responsiveness to gefitinib with molecular markers of the EGFR/ErbB receptor family signaling pathway using 10 established HNSCC lines in vitro. IC50 of gefitinib sensitivity was determined using clonogenic survival assays. ErbB signaling was assessed by Western and real-time reverse transcription-PCR analyses of EGFR, ErbB2, ErbB3, and ErbB4 expression levels as well as by phosphorylation analysis of pEGFR, pErbB2, pErbB3, pAkt, and pErk. EGFR sequences encoding kinase domain and EGFR gene copy numbers were determined by cDNA sequencing and real-time PCR, respectively. Finally, responsiveness to gefitinib was compared with responsiveness to the anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab (Erbitux).
RESULTS: Expression levels of pErbB2 (P = 0.02) and total ErbB3 protein (P = 0.02) associated with resistance to gefitinib. Combining gefitinib with pertuzumab (Omnitarg), an antibody targeting ErbB2 heterodimerization, provided additional growth-inhibitory effect over gefitinib alone on relatively gefitinib-resistant HNSCC cell lines. The same markers did not predict resistance to cetuximab. In contrast, a similar trend suggesting association between EGFR gene copy number and drug sensitivity was observed for both gefitinib (P = 0.0498) and cetuximab (P = 0.053). No activating EGFR mutations were identified.
CONCLUSIONS: EGFR amplification may predict sensitivity to gefitinib in HNSCC. However, other EGFR/ErbB receptor family members than EGFR may contribute to resistance to gefitinib. ErbB2 and ErbB3 may have potential as predictive markers and as therapeutic targets for combination therapy in treatment of HNSCC with gefitinib.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16818711     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  93 in total

Review 1.  Understanding resistance to EGFR inhibitors-impact on future treatment strategies.

Authors:  Deric L Wheeler; Emily F Dunn; Paul M Harari
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3) blockade with U3-1287/AMG888 enhances the efficacy of radiation therapy in lung and head and neck carcinoma.

Authors:  Chunrong Li; Toni M Brand; Mari Iida; Shyhmin Huang; Eric A Armstrong; Albert van der Kogel; Deric L Wheeler
Journal:  Discov Med       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.970

3.  HER3 comes of age: new insights into its functions and role in signaling, tumor biology, and cancer therapy.

Authors:  Marcia R Campbell; Dhara Amin; Mark M Moasser
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Concurrent use of vinorelbine and gefitinib induces supra-additive effect in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines.

Authors:  Kaisa Erjala; Misa Raitanen; Jarmo Kulmala; Reidar Grénman
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 5.  Pseudoscaffolds and anchoring proteins: the difference is in the details.

Authors:  Stacey Aggarwal-Howarth; John D Scott
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2017-04-15       Impact factor: 5.407

6.  A phase 1 study of cetuximab and lapatinib in patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies.

Authors:  John F Deeken; Hongkun Wang; Deepa Subramaniam; Aiwu Ruth He; Jimmy Hwang; John L Marshall; Christina E Urso; Yiru Wang; Corinne Ramos; Kenneth Steadman; Michael J Pishvaian
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Pim-1 kinase expression predicts radiation response in squamocellular carcinoma of head and neck and is under the control of epidermal growth factor receptor.

Authors:  Katriina Peltola; Maija Hollmen; Sanna-Mari Maula; Eeva Rainio; Raija Ristamäki; Marjaana Luukkaa; Jouko Sandholm; Maria Sundvall; Klaus Elenius; Päivi J Koskinen; Reidar Grenman; Sirpa Jalkanen
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.715

8.  The small GTPase ADP-Ribosylation Factor 1 mediates the sensitivity of triple negative breast cancer cells to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Eric Haines; Sabrina Schlienger; Audrey Claing
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.742

9.  S100A14, a member of the EF-hand calcium-binding proteins, is overexpressed in breast cancer and acts as a modulator of HER2 signaling.

Authors:  Chengshan Xu; Hongyan Chen; Xiang Wang; Jidong Gao; Yiqun Che; Yi Li; Fang Ding; Aiping Luo; Shuguang Zhang; Zhihua Liu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  Nexus of signaling and endocytosis in oncogenesis driven by non-small cell lung cancer-associated epidermal growth factor receptor mutants.

Authors:  Byung Min Chung; Eric Tom; Neha Zutshi; Timothy Alan Bielecki; Vimla Band; Hamid Band
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.