Literature DB >> 16818586

Ignoring evidence of circumcision benefits.

Edgar J Schoen1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2006        PMID： 16818586     DOI： 10.1542/peds.2005-2881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN： 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Rebuttal: Should newborns be circumcised? YES.

Authors:  Edgar J Schoen
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Should newborns be circumcised? Yes.

Authors:  Edgar J Schoen
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Making the case for circumcision as a public health strategy: opening the dialogue.

Authors:  José G Castro; Deborah Lynne Jones; Maria Lopez; Isabel Barradas; Stephen M Weiss
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.078

4.  Male circumcision for the prevention of acquisition and transmission of sexually transmitted infections: the case for neonatal circumcision.

Authors:  Aaron A R Tobian; Ronald H Gray; Thomas C Quinn
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2010-01

5.  Infant male circumcision: healthcare provider knowledge and associated factors.

Authors:  Erin J Starzyk; Michele A Kelley; Rachel N Caskey; Alan Schwartz; Joan F Kennelly; Robert C Bailey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.