OBJECTIVES:Television viewing and physical inactivity increase the risk of obesity in youth. Thus, identifying new interventions that increase physical activity and reduce television viewing would be helpful in the prevention and treatment of pediatric obesity. This study evaluated the effects of open-loop feedback plus reinforcement versus open-loop feedback alone on physical activity, targeted sedentary behavior, body composition, and energy intake in youth. METHODS:Thirty overweight or obese8- to 12-year-old children were randomly assigned to an intervention (n = 14) or control group (n = 16). Participants wore accelerometers every day for 8 weeks and attended biweekly meetings to download the activity monitors. For children in the open-loop feedback plus reinforcement (intervention) group, accumulating 400 counts of physical activity on pedometers earned 1 hour of television/VCR/DVD time, which was controlled by a Token TV electronic device. Open-loop feedback control subjects wore activity monitors but had free access to targeted sedentary behavior. RESULTS: Compared with controls, the open-loop feedback plus reinforcement group demonstrated significantly greater increases in daily physical activity counts (+65% vs +16%) and minutes per day of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (+9.4 vs +0.3) and greater reductions in minutes per day spent in television viewing (-116.1 vs +14.3). The intervention group also showed more favorable changes in body composition, dietary fat intake, and energy intake from snacks compared with controls. Reductions in sedentary behavior were directly related to reductions in BMI, fat intake, snack intake, and snack intake while watching television. CONCLUSIONS: Providing feedback of physical activity in combination with reinforcing physical activity with sedentary behavior is a simple method of modifying the home environment that may play an important role in treating and preventing child obesity.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Television viewing and physical inactivity increase the risk of obesity in youth. Thus, identifying new interventions that increase physical activity and reduce television viewing would be helpful in the prevention and treatment of pediatric obesity. This study evaluated the effects of open-loop feedback plus reinforcement versus open-loop feedback alone on physical activity, targeted sedentary behavior, body composition, and energy intake in youth. METHODS: Thirty overweight or obese 8- to 12-year-old children were randomly assigned to an intervention (n = 14) or control group (n = 16). Participants wore accelerometers every day for 8 weeks and attended biweekly meetings to download the activity monitors. For children in the open-loop feedback plus reinforcement (intervention) group, accumulating 400 counts of physical activity on pedometers earned 1 hour of television/VCR/DVD time, which was controlled by a Token TV electronic device. Open-loop feedback control subjects wore activity monitors but had free access to targeted sedentary behavior. RESULTS: Compared with controls, the open-loop feedback plus reinforcement group demonstrated significantly greater increases in daily physical activity counts (+65% vs +16%) and minutes per day of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (+9.4 vs +0.3) and greater reductions in minutes per day spent in television viewing (-116.1 vs +14.3). The intervention group also showed more favorable changes in body composition, dietary fat intake, and energy intake from snacks compared with controls. Reductions in sedentary behavior were directly related to reductions in BMI, fat intake, snack intake, and snack intake while watching television. CONCLUSIONS: Providing feedback of physical activity in combination with reinforcing physical activity with sedentary behavior is a simple method of modifying the home environment that may play an important role in treating and preventing childobesity.
Authors: Lisa M Klesges; Natalie A Williams; Kara S Davis; Joanna Buscemi; Katherine M Kitzmann Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Karl E Minges; Neville Owen; Jo Salmon; Ariana Chao; David W Dunstan; Robin Whittemore Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Jacob Szeszulski; Sonia Vega-López; Michael Todd; Frank Ray; Alma Behar; Maria Campbell; Adrian Chavez; Ryan Eckert; Anabell Lorenzo-Quintero; Leopoldo Hartmann Manrique; Noe C Crespo Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2020-02-13 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Jeffery J Honas; Richard A Washburn; Bryan K Smith; Jerry L Greene; Joseph E Donnelly Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Elizabeth M Cespedes; Christine M Horan; Matthew W Gillman; Steven L Gortmaker; Sarah Price; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Kathleen Mitchell; Elsie M Taveras Journal: Prev Med Date: 2014-02-08 Impact factor: 4.018