AIM: To assess the heterogeneity of gross motor milestone achievement ages between the sexes and among study sites participating in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study (MGRS). METHODS: Six gross motor milestones (sitting without support, hands-and-knees crawling, standing with assistance, walking with assistance, standing alone, and walking alone) were assessed longitudinally in five of the six MGRS sites, namely Ghana, India, Norway, Oman and the USA. Testing was started at 4 mo of age and performed monthly until 12 mo, and bimonthly thereafter until all milestones were achieved or the child reached 24 mo of age. Four approaches were used to assess heterogeneity of the ages of milestone achievement on the basis of sex or study site. RESULTS: No significant, consistent differences in milestone achievement ages were detected between boys and girls, nor were any site sex interactions noted. However, some differences among sites were observed. The contribution of inter-site heterogeneity to the total variance was < 5% for those milestones with the least heterogeneous ages of achievement (hands-and-knees crawling, standing alone, and walking alone) and nearly 15% for those with the most heterogeneous ages of achievement (sitting without support, standing with assistance, and walking with assistance). CONCLUSION: Inter-site differences, most likely due to culture-specific care behaviours, reflect normal development among healthy populations across the wide range of cultures and environments included in the MGRS. These analyses support the appropriateness of pooling data from all sites and for both sexes for the purpose of developing an international standard for gross motor development.
AIM: To assess the heterogeneity of gross motor milestone achievement ages between the sexes and among study sites participating in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study (MGRS). METHODS: Six gross motor milestones (sitting without support, hands-and-knees crawling, standing with assistance, walking with assistance, standing alone, and walking alone) were assessed longitudinally in five of the six MGRS sites, namely Ghana, India, Norway, Oman and the USA. Testing was started at 4 mo of age and performed monthly until 12 mo, and bimonthly thereafter until all milestones were achieved or the child reached 24 mo of age. Four approaches were used to assess heterogeneity of the ages of milestone achievement on the basis of sex or study site. RESULTS: No significant, consistent differences in milestone achievement ages were detected between boys and girls, nor were any site sex interactions noted. However, some differences among sites were observed. The contribution of inter-site heterogeneity to the total variance was < 5% for those milestones with the least heterogeneous ages of achievement (hands-and-knees crawling, standing alone, and walking alone) and nearly 15% for those with the most heterogeneous ages of achievement (sitting without support, standing with assistance, and walking with assistance). CONCLUSION: Inter-site differences, most likely due to culture-specific care behaviours, reflect normal development among healthy populations across the wide range of cultures and environments included in the MGRS. These analyses support the appropriateness of pooling data from all sites and for both sexes for the purpose of developing an international standard for gross motor development.
Authors: Jacob J Gissy; Teresa Johnson; Deborah J Fox; Anil Kumar; Emma Ciafaloni; Anthonie J van Essen; Holly L Peay; Ann Martin; Ann Lucas; Richard S Finkel Journal: Neuromuscul Disord Date: 2017-07-21 Impact factor: 4.296
Authors: Rosa M Angulo-Barroso; Lauren Schapiro; Weilang Liang; Onike Rodrigues; Tal Shafir; Niko Kaciroti; Sandra W Jacobson; Betsy Lozoff Journal: Dev Psychobiol Date: 2010-10-28 Impact factor: 3.038
Authors: Elisa Ballardini; M Sisti; N Basaglia; M Benedetto; A Baldan; C Borgna-Pignatti; G Garani Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2018-07-20 Impact factor: 3.183
Authors: Birgit Bjerre Høyer; Cecilia Høst Ramlau-Hansen; Henning Sloth Pedersen; Katarzyna Góralczyk; Lyubov Chumak; Bo Ag Jönsson; Jens Peter Bonde; Gunnar Toft Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-02-14 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Charlotte L Ridgway; Ken K Ong; Tuija H Tammelin; Stephen Sharp; Ulf Ekelund; Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-08-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ian Flatters; Faisal Mushtaq; Liam J B Hill; Raymond J Holt; Richard M Wilkie; Mark Mon-Williams Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2014-05-14 Impact factor: 1.972