Literature DB >> 16817535

The evolution of parasites in response to tolerance in their hosts: the good, the bad, and apparent commensalism.

Martin R Miller1, Andrew White, Michael Boots.   

Abstract

Tolerance to parasites reduces the harm that infection causes the host (virulence). Here we investigate the evolution of parasites in response to host tolerance. We show that parasites may evolve either higher or lower within-host growth rates depending on the nature of the tolerance mechanism. If tolerance reduces virulence by a constant factor, the parasite is always selected to increase its growth rate. Alternatively, if tolerance reduces virulence in a nonlinear manner such that it is less effective at reducing the damage caused by higher growth rates, this may select for faster or slower replicating parasites. If the host is able to completely tolerate pathogen damage up to a certain replication rate, this may result in apparent commensalism, whereby infection causes no apparent virulence but the original evolution of tolerance has been costly. Tolerance tends to increase disease prevalence and may therefore lead to more, rather than less, disease-induced mortality. If the parasite is selected, even a highly efficient tolerance mechanism may result in more individuals in total dying from disease. However, the evolution of tolerance often, although not always, reduces the individual risk of dying from infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16817535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  55 in total

1.  Exogenous glucocorticoids amplify the costs of infection by reducing resistance and tolerance, but effects are mitigated by co-infection.

Authors:  Laura A Schoenle; Ignacio T Moore; Alana M Dudek; Ellen B Garcia; Morgan Mays; Mark F Haussmann; Daniela Cimini; Frances Bonier
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  The roles of tolerance in the evolution, maintenance and breakdown of mutualism.

Authors:  David P Edwards
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-05-30

3.  Maintenance of host variation in tolerance to pathogens and parasites.

Authors:  A Best; A White; M Boots
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Decomposing health: tolerance and resistance to parasites in animals.

Authors:  Lars Råberg; Andrea L Graham; Andrew F Read
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  The role of ecological feedbacks in the evolution of host defence: what does theory tell us?

Authors:  Michael Boots; Alex Best; Martin R Miller; Andrew White
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Age-specific variation in immune response in Drosophila melanogaster has a genetic basis.

Authors:  Tashauna M Felix; Kimberly A Hughes; Eric A Stone; Jenny M Drnevich; Jeff Leips
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Disease tolerance as a defense strategy.

Authors:  Ruslan Medzhitov; David S Schneider; Miguel P Soares
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Resistance and tolerance to foreign elements by prokaryotic immune systems - curating the genome.

Authors:  Gregory W Goldberg; Luciano A Marraffini
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 53.106

Review 9.  The coevolution of virulence: tolerance in perspective.

Authors:  Tom J Little; David M Shuker; Nick Colegrave; Troy Day; Andrea L Graham
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 6.823

10.  Animal defenses against infectious agents: is damage control more important than pathogen control.

Authors:  Andrew F Read; Andrea L Graham; Lars Råberg
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.