Literature DB >> 16817510

SNOOP:a program for demonstrating the consequences of premature and repeated null hypothesis testing.

Michael J Strube1.   

Abstract

The ease with which data can be collected and analyzed via personal computer makes it potentially attractive to "peek" at the data before a target sample size is achieved. This tactic might seem appealing because data collection could be stopped early, which would save valuable resources, if a peek revealed a significant effect. Unfortunately, such data snooping comes with a cost. When the null hypothesis is true, the Type I error rate is inflated, sometimes quite substantially. If the null hypothesis is false, premature significance testing leads to inflated estimates of power and effect size. This program provides simulation results for a wide variety of premature and repeated null hypothesis testing scenarios. It gives researchers the ability to know in advance the consequences of data peeking so that appropriate corrective action can be taken.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16817510     DOI: 10.3758/bf03192746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  14 in total

1.  Too good to be true: publication bias in two prominent studies from experimental psychology.

Authors:  Gregory Francis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

2.  A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values.

Authors:  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

Review 3.  Publication bias and the failure of replication in experimental psychology.

Authors:  Gregory Francis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

Review 4.  Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning.

Authors:  Tal Yarkoni; Jacob Westfall
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-08-25

5.  The same old New Look: Publication bias in a study of wishful seeing.

Authors:  Gregory Francis
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012-03-22

6.  When decision heuristics and science collide.

Authors:  Erica C Yu; Amber M Sprenger; Rick P Thomas; Michael R Dougherty
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04

7.  A surge of p-values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too).

Authors:  Joost Cf de Winter; Dimitra Dodou
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results.

Authors:  Zoltan Dienes
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-29

9.  Stopping to food can reduce intake. Effects of stimulus-specificity and individual differences in dietary restraint.

Authors:  Natalia S Lawrence; Frederick Verbruggen; Sinead Morrison; Rachel C Adams; Christopher D Chambers
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.868

10.  Statistical conclusion validity: some common threats and simple remedies.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.