Literature DB >> 16817148

A practical approach to computing power for generalized linear models with nominal, count, or ordinal responses.

Robert H Lyles1, Hung-Mo Lin, John M Williamson.   

Abstract

Data analysts facing study design questions on a regular basis could derive substantial benefit from a straightforward and unified approach to power calculations for generalized linear models. Many current proposals for dealing with binary, ordinal, or count outcomes are conceptually or computationally demanding, limited in terms of accommodating covariates, and/or have not been extensively assessed for accuracy assuming moderate sample sizes. Here, we present a simple method for estimating conditional power that requires only standard software for fitting the desired generalized linear model for a non-continuous outcome. The model is fit to an appropriate expanded data set using easily calculated weights that represent response probabilities given the assumed values of the parameters. The variance-covariance matrix resulting from this fit is then used in conjunction with an established non-central chi square approximation to the distribution of the Wald statistic. Alternatively, the model can be re-fit under the null hypothesis to approximate power based on the likelihood ratio statistic. We provide guidelines for constructing a representative expanded data set to allow close approximation of unconditional power based on the assumed joint distribution of the covariates. Relative to prior proposals, the approach proves particularly flexible for handling one or more continuous covariates without any need for discretizing. We illustrate the method for a variety of outcome types and covariate patterns, using simulations to demonstrate its accuracy for realistic sample sizes. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 16817148     DOI: 10.1002/sim.2617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  10 in total

1.  Mother-child interactions and the associations with child healthcare utilization in low-income urban families.

Authors:  Margaret L Holland; Byung-Kwang Yoo; Harriet Kitzman; Linda Chaudron; Peter G Szilagyi; Helena Temkin-Greener
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-01

2.  Sensitivity analysis for misclassification in logistic regression via likelihood methods and predictive value weighting.

Authors:  Robert H Lyles; Ji Lin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Sample Size for Joint Testing of Indirect Effects.

Authors:  Eric Vittinghoff; Torsten B Neilands
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2015-11

4.  An Efficient Gatekeeper Algorithm for Detecting GxE.

Authors:  Jimmy T Efird
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2010-05-12

5.  Exemplary data set sample size calculation for Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests.

Authors:  George Divine; Alissa Kapke; Suzanne Havstad; Christine L M Joseph
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Power estimation using simulations for air pollution time-series studies.

Authors:  Andrea Winquist; Mitchel Klein; Paige Tolbert; Stefanie Ebelt Sarnat
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 5.984

7.  Sample size issues in time series regressions of counts on environmental exposures.

Authors:  Ben G Armstrong; Antonio Gasparrini; Aurelio Tobias; Francesco Sera
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  scPower accelerates and optimizes the design of multi-sample single cell transcriptomic studies.

Authors:  Katharina T Schmid; Barbara Höllbacher; Cristiana Cruceanu; Anika Böttcher; Heiko Lickert; Elisabeth B Binder; Fabian J Theis; Matthias Heinig
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Derivation of clinical prediction rules for identifying patients with non-acute low back pain who respond best to a lumbar stabilization exercise program at post-treatment and six-month follow-up.

Authors:  Christian Larivière; Khalil Rabhi; Richard Preuss; Marie-France Coutu; Nicolas Roy; Sharon M Henry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.752

10.  A statistical simulation model for field testing of non-target organisms in environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants.

Authors:  Paul W Goedhart; Hilko van der Voet; Ferdinando Baldacchino; Salvatore Arpaia
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 2.912

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.