Literature DB >> 16817068

Gender differences in the content of cognitive distraction during sex.

Marta Meana1, Sarah E Nunnink.   

Abstract

This study compared 220 college men and 237 college women on two types of self-reported cognitive distraction during sex, performance- and appearance-based. Affect, psychological distress, sexual knowledge, attitudes, fantasies, experiences, body image, satisfaction, and sexual function were assessed with the Derogatis Sexual Functioning Inventory and the Sexual History Form to determine associations with distraction. Between-gender analyses revealed that women reported higher levels of overall and appearance-based distraction than did men, but similar levels of performance-based distraction. Within-gender analyses revealed that women reported as much of one type of distraction as the other, while men reported more performance- than appearance-based distraction. In women, appearance-based distraction was predicted by negative body image, psychological distress, and not being in a relationship, while performance-based distraction was predicted by negative body image, psychological distress, and sexual dissatisfaction. In men, appearance-based distraction was predicted by negative body image, sexual dissatisfaction and not being in a relationship, while performance-based distraction was predicted by negative body image and sexual dissatisfaction. Investigating the content of cognitive distraction may be useful in understanding gender differences in sexual experience and in refining cognitive components of sex therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16817068     DOI: 10.1080/00224490609552299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Res        ISSN: 0022-4499


  8 in total

1.  Sexual Health Concerns Among Cancer Survivors: Testing a Novel Information-Need Measure Among Breast and Prostate Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Sheila A Crowley; Sallie M Foley; Daniela Wittmann; Christina H Jagielski; Rodney L Dunn; Patricia M Clark; Jennifer J Griggs; Catherine Peterson; Marcia Leonard; Lawrence C An; John T Wei; James E Montie; Nancy K Janz
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Predictors of body appearance cognitive distraction during sexual activity in a sample of men with ED.

Authors:  P M Pascoal; C F Raposo; L B Oliveira
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 2.896

3.  Empirical Evaluation of Rainbow Reflections: A Comic Book Anthology on Body Image for Queer Men.

Authors:  Stéphanie E M Gauvin; Phillip Joy; Brittany L Dunn; Matthew Lee; Rachel E Williamson
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-01-04

4.  The association between sexual satisfaction and body image in women.

Authors:  Yasisca Pujols; Brooke N Seal; Cindy M Meston
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Sex-related impairment and patient needs/benefits in anogenital psoriasis: Difficult-to-communicate topics and their impact on patient-centred care.

Authors:  Neuza da Silva; Matthias Augustin; Anna Langenbruch; Ulrich Mrowietz; Kristian Reich; Diamant Thaçi; Wolf-Henning Boehncke; Natalia Kirsten; Alexandra Danckworth; Rachel Sommer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Body Image, Orgasmic Response, and Sexual Relationship Satisfaction: Understanding Relationships and Establishing Typologies Based on Body Image Satisfaction.

Authors:  Zsolt Horvath; Betina Hodt Smith; Dorottya Sal; Krisztina Hevesi; David L Rowland
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2020-07-26       Impact factor: 2.491

7.  The Heteronormativity Theory of Low Sexual Desire in Women Partnered with Men.

Authors:  Sari M van Anders; Debby Herbenick; Lori A Brotto; Emily A Harris; Sara B Chadwick
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-08-23

8.  The Relationship Between Body Image and Domains of Sexual Functioning Among Heterosexual, Emerging Adult Women.

Authors:  Christopher Quinn-Nilas; Lindsay Benson; Robin R Milhausen; Andrea C Buchholz; Melissa Goncalves
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 2.491

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.