BACKGROUND: To investigate the efficacy, influencing factors and safety of PEG-INF alpha-2a (PEG-INF-2a) in the treatment of hepatitis C. METHODS: Totally 89 patients with hepatitis C were included in this study and 46 patients were treated with PEG-INF-2a (180 microg or 135 microg/week) and RBV 900 mg/d, 43 patients were treated with IFNalpha-2a (5 MIU/qod) and RBV 900 mg/d. The time of treatment was 48 weeks, and all the patients were visited 24 weeks after treatment. There were no significant differences between the two groups in pretreatment HCV-RNA, HCV genotype and other clinical data. The main parameters to evaluate the efficacy were virological and biochemical responses. The side effects were intensively observed. RESULTS: Sustained virological response (SVR) rate in PEG-IFNalpha-2a group was significantly higher than that in IFNalpha-2a group (56.5% and 19.5% respectively, P<0.001). As the patients were divided according to HCV genotype 1 and high virus load, the SVR rate of PEG-INF alpha-2a group was higher than IFNalpha-2a group (P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference between two groups in the patients with non-genotype 1 and low viral load (P=0.664, 0.116). Similar side-effects were observed in PEG-IFNalpha-2a group and IFNalpha-2a group, but the rate of weight decline and the degree of leukocyte decrease were more significant in PEG-INF alpha-2a group than in IFNalpha-2a group (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: The efficacy of PEG-INF alpha-2a in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C is superior to that of conventional IFNalpha-2a, PEG-INF alpha-2a had good tolerance and safety profiles.
BACKGROUND: To investigate the efficacy, influencing factors and safety of PEG-INF alpha-2a (PEG-INF-2a) in the treatment of hepatitis C. METHODS: Totally 89 patients with hepatitis C were included in this study and 46 patients were treated with PEG-INF-2a (180 microg or 135 microg/week) and RBV 900 mg/d, 43 patients were treated with IFNalpha-2a (5 MIU/qod) and RBV 900 mg/d. The time of treatment was 48 weeks, and all the patients were visited 24 weeks after treatment. There were no significant differences between the two groups in pretreatment HCV-RNA, HCV genotype and other clinical data. The main parameters to evaluate the efficacy were virological and biochemical responses. The side effects were intensively observed. RESULTS: Sustained virological response (SVR) rate in PEG-IFNalpha-2a group was significantly higher than that in IFNalpha-2a group (56.5% and 19.5% respectively, P<0.001). As the patients were divided according to HCV genotype 1 and high virus load, the SVR rate of PEG-INF alpha-2a group was higher than IFNalpha-2a group (P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference between two groups in the patients with non-genotype 1 and low viral load (P=0.664, 0.116). Similar side-effects were observed in PEG-IFNalpha-2a group and IFNalpha-2a group, but the rate of weight decline and the degree of leukocyte decrease were more significant in PEG-INF alpha-2a group than in IFNalpha-2a group (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: The efficacy of PEG-INF alpha-2a in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C is superior to that of conventional IFNalpha-2a, PEG-INF alpha-2a had good tolerance and safety profiles.