Literature DB >> 16816694

Prevalence of abnormal pattern reversal visual evoked potentials in craniosynostosis.

Dorothy A Thompson1, Alki Liasis, Sharon Hardy, Richard Hagan, Richard D Hayward, Robert D Evans, Kanwal K Nischal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence and type of changes observed in the pattern reversal visual evoked potentials recorded at the first assessment of children with craniosynostosis.
METHODS: Visual evoked potentials were recorded from 114 patients with craniosynostosis. Eighty-one patients were syndromic and 33 were nonsyndromic. No patient had received any craniofacial surgical intervention. At the time of the test, 22 of 40 patients were aged 6 months and younger, and 18 patients were between 6 months and 1 year of age. Pattern reversal visual evoked potentials were recorded from a midoccipital electrode positioned 3 cm above the inion. The pattern reversal visual evoked potentials elicited to 50' checks with three reversals per second viewed with both eyes were analyzed for n80-p100 amplitude, p100 latency, and breadth of waveform.
RESULTS: Sixty percent of patients had abnormal pattern reversal visual evoked potentials to 50' checks. This did not show a significant association with age, or classification of craniosynostosis.
CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of abnormal pattern reversal visual evoked potentials to a robust stimulus suggests that visual pathway dysfunction, as measured electrophysiologically, can affect a majority of patients with craniosynostosis. This study indicates that a baseline evaluation of all children with craniosynostosis at their first presentation is essential if subsequent electrophysiologic visual pathway monitoring is to take place.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16816694     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000220873.72953.3e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  10 in total

1.  Use of neuroimaging measurements of optic nerve sheath diameter to assess intracranial pressure in craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Mostafa Haredy; Giulio Zuccoli; Mandeep Tamber; Amani Davis; Ken Nischal; Jesse A Goldstein
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Optical coherence tomography: a quantitative tool to screen for papilledema in craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Caroline Driessen; Jordi Eveleens; Isabel Bleyen; Marie-Lise van Veelen; Koen Joosten; Irene Mathijssen
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 3.  Visual function in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Giovanni Baranello; Gessica Vasco; Daniela Ricci; Eugenio Mercuri
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Syndromic craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Christopher Derderian; James Seaward
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 5.  Visual outcomes in children with syndromic craniosynostosis: a review of 165 cases.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Hinds; Dorothy A Thompson; Sohaib R Rufai; Kelly Weston; Kemmy Schwiebert; Vasiliki Panteli; Greg James; Richard Bowman
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.456

6.  Detection of intracranial hypertension in children using optical coherence tomography: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Sohaib R Rufai; Noor Ul Owase Jeelani; Rebecca J McLean
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Serial, Visually-Evoked Potentials for the Assessment of Visual Function in Patients with Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Mostafa M Haredy; Alki Liasis; Amani Davis; Kathleen Koesarie; Valeria Fu; Joseph E Losee; Jesse A Goldstein; Ken K Nischal
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Recognition of intracranial hypertension using handheld optical coherence tomography in children (RIO Study): a diagnostic accuracy study protocol.

Authors:  Sohaib R Rufai; Noor Ul Owase Jeelani; Richard Bowman; Catey Bunce; Frank A Proudlock; Irene Gottlob
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Photopic negative response (PhNR) in the diagnosis and monitoring of raised intracranial pressure in children: a prospective cross-sectional and longitudinal protocol.

Authors:  Oliver Rajesh Marmoy; Emma Hodson-Tole; Dorothy Ann Thompson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  Clinical electrophysiology of the optic nerve and retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Oliver R Marmoy; Suresh Viswanathan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.775

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.