Literature DB >> 16816220

A comparison of mirtazapine and nortriptyline following two consecutive failed medication treatments for depressed outpatients: a STAR*D report.

Maurizio Fava1, A John Rush, Stephen R Wisniewski, Andrew A Nierenberg, Jonathan E Alpert, Patrick J McGrath, Michael E Thase, Diane Warden, Melanie Biggs, James F Luther, George Niederehe, Louise Ritz, Madhukar H Trivedi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Few controlled studies have addressed the issue of which antidepressant medications should be recommended for outpatients who have not responded to multiple treatment trials. This study compared the efficacy of switching to mirtazapine to that of switching to a tricyclic antidepressant (nortriptyline) following two prospective, consecutive, unsuccessful medication treatments for nonpsychotic major depressive disorder.
METHOD: Following lack of remission or an inability to tolerate an initial trial of citalopram for up to 12 weeks (first step) and a second trial with either monotherapy involving another antidepressant or augmentation of citalopram with bupropion or buspirone (second step), adult outpatients (N=235) with nonpsychotic major depressive disorder were randomly assigned to 14 weeks of treatment with mirtazapine (up to 60 mg/day) (N=114) or nortriptyline (up to 200 mg/day) (N=121). The primary outcome, symptom remission, was defined a priori as a total exit score of </=7 on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. The 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR(16)), obtained at treatment visits, provided secondary outcomes of remission (score </=5 at exit) and response (>/=50% reduction in score from baseline).
RESULTS: For mirtazapine, remission rates were 12.3% and 8.0% per the Hamilton and QIDS-SR(16) scores, respectively. For nortriptyline, remission rates were 19.8% and 12.4%, respectively. QIDS-SR(16) response rates were 13.4% for mirtazapine and 16.5% for nortriptyline. Neither response nor remission rates statistically differed by treatment, nor did these two treatments differ in tolerability or adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: Switching to a third antidepressant monotherapy regimen after two consecutive unsuccessful antidepressant trials resulted in low remission rates (<20%) among patients with major depressive disorder.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16816220     DOI: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.7.1161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0002-953X            Impact factor:   19.242


  69 in total

Review 1.  Mirtazapine versus other antidepressive agents for depression.

Authors:  Norio Watanabe; Ichiro M Omori; Atsuo Nakagawa; Andrea Cipriani; Corrado Barbui; Rachel Churchill; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-12-07

2.  Augmentation and combination strategies to treat the residual symptoms of major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Maurizio Fava; Steven D Targum
Journal:  Psychiatry (Edgmont)       Date:  2007-02

Review 3.  Ketamine for treatment-resistant unipolar depression: current evidence.

Authors:  Sanjay J Mathew; Asim Shah; Kyle Lapidus; Crystal Clark; Noor Jarun; Britta Ostermeyer; James W Murrough
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 4.  Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for depression: what do we know now and what should be done next?

Authors:  Ziad Nahas; Carol Burns; Milton J Foust; Baron Short; Tal Herbsman; Mark S George
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.285

5.  Impact of pretreatment with antidepressants on the efficacy of duloxetine in terms of mood symptoms and functioning: an analysis of 15 pooled major depressive disorder studies.

Authors:  Bruno R Barros; Alexander Schacht; Michael Happich; Foula Televantou; Lovisa Berggren; Daniel J Walker; Hector J Dueñas
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2014-10-02

Review 6.  [Problems of evidence-based medicine in psychopharmacotherapy: problems of evidence grading and of the evidence basis for complex clinical decision making].

Authors:  H-J Möller; W Maier
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.214

7.  Translating Science Into Service: Lessons Learned From the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) Study.

Authors:  Norman Sussman
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2007

8.  Empirically derived decision trees for the treatment of late-life depression.

Authors:  Carmen Andreescu; Benoit H Mulsant; Patricia R Houck; Ellen M Whyte; Sati Mazumdar; Alexandre Y Dombrovski; Bruce G Pollock; Charles F Reynolds
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  What Are the Implications of the STAR*D Trial for Primary Care? A Review and Synthesis.

Authors:  Nhu N Huynh; Roger S McIntyre
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2008

Review 10.  Therapeutic options for treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  Richard C Shelton; Olawale Osuntokun; Alexandra N Heinloth; Sara A Corya
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.749

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.