OBJECTIVE: To examine patient treatment preferences and satisfaction with an office-based procedure for early pregnancy failure and to compare resource use and cost between office and operating room management of early pregnancy failure. METHODS: This study was a prospective observational study of 165 women presenting for surgical management of early pregnancy failure. Participants completed a preoperative questionnaire addressing treatment preferences and expectations and a postoperative questionnaire measuring level of pain experienced and satisfaction with care. Resource use was determined by measuring the time patients spent at the health care facility and the actual procedure time. Cost was estimated using an institutional database. RESULTS: One hundred fifteen women from the office and 50 from the operating room were enrolled. Patients selecting outpatient management scored "privacy," "avoiding going to sleep," and "previous experience" higher than the operating room group (P < .05). Patients who perceived that their physicians preferred one procedure over the other were more likely to select that procedure (P < .001). Satisfaction was high in both groups, and underestimating the procedure's discomfort was negatively associated with satisfaction (P < .002). Costs were greater than two-fold higher in the operating room group compared with the office group (P < .01). Complications were uncommon, but hemorrhage-related complications were four times more common in the operating room group than in the office group (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Office-based surgical management of early pregnancy failure is an acceptable option for many women and offers substantial resource and cost savings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.
OBJECTIVE: To examine patient treatment preferences and satisfaction with an office-based procedure for early pregnancy failure and to compare resource use and cost between office and operating room management of early pregnancy failure. METHODS: This study was a prospective observational study of 165 women presenting for surgical management of early pregnancy failure. Participants completed a preoperative questionnaire addressing treatment preferences and expectations and a postoperative questionnaire measuring level of pain experienced and satisfaction with care. Resource use was determined by measuring the time patients spent at the health care facility and the actual procedure time. Cost was estimated using an institutional database. RESULTS: One hundred fifteen women from the office and 50 from the operating room were enrolled. Patients selecting outpatient management scored "privacy," "avoiding going to sleep," and "previous experience" higher than the operating room group (P < .05). Patients who perceived that their physicians preferred one procedure over the other were more likely to select that procedure (P < .001). Satisfaction was high in both groups, and underestimating the procedure's discomfort was negatively associated with satisfaction (P < .002). Costs were greater than two-fold higher in the operating room group compared with the office group (P < .01). Complications were uncommon, but hemorrhage-related complications were four times more common in the operating room group than in the office group (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Office-based surgical management of early pregnancy failure is an acceptable option for many women and offers substantial resource and cost savings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.
Authors: Vanessa K Dalton; Lisa H Harris; Jason D Bell; Jay Schulkin; Jodi Steinauer; Melissa Zochowski; A Mark Fendrick Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-03-17 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Mary Rausch; Scott Lorch; Karine Chung; Margaret Frederick; Jun Zhang; Kurt Barnhart Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2011-12-21 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Vanessa K Dalton; Lisa H Harris; Katherine J Gold; Lisa Kane-Low; Jay Schulkin; Ken Guire; A Mark Fendrick Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2010-03-15 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Vanessa K Dalton; Lisa H Harris; Sarah J Clark; Lisa Cohn; Ken Guire; A Mark Fendrick Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Sarah C M Roberts; Nancy Beam; Guodong Liu; Ushma D Upadhyay; Douglas L Leslie; Djibril Ba; Jennifer L Kerns Journal: J Patient Saf Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 2.243
Authors: Jessica K Wu; Emily N Sadecki; Moira A Kyweluk; Suneeta Senapati; Anne N Flynn; Elizabeth Steider; Tracey Thomas; Kurt T Barnhart Journal: F S Rep Date: 2022-07-09
Authors: Blair G Darney; Marcia R Weaver; Deborah VanDerhei; Nancy G Stevens; Sarah W Prager Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2013-04-03 Impact factor: 2.655