BACKGROUND: Shortage of donor organs is one of the major problems for liver transplant programmes. Living liver donation is a possible alternative, which could increase the amount of donor organs available in the short term. OBJECTIVE: To assess the attitude towards living organ donation in the general population to have an overview of the overall attitude within Germany. METHODS: A representative quota of people was evaluated by a mail questionnaire (n = 250). This questionnaire had 24 questions assessing the willingness to be a living liver donor for different potential recipients. Factors for and against living liver donation were assessed. RESULTS: Donating a part of the liver was almost as accepted as donating a kidney. The readiness to donate was highest when participants were asked to donate for children. In an urgent life-threatening situation the will to donate was especially high, whereas it was lower in the case of recipient substance misuse. More women than men expressed a higher disposition to donate for their children. Sex, religion, state of health and age of the donor, however, did not influence other questions on the readiness to consider living organ donation. The will for postmortem organ donation positively correlated with the will to be a living organ donor. CONCLUSIONS: The motivation in different demographic subgroups to participate in living liver transplantation is described. Differences in donation readiness resulting from the situation of every donor and recipient are thoroughly outlined. The acceptance for a living liver donation was found to be high - and comparable to that of living kidney donation.
BACKGROUND: Shortage of donor organs is one of the major problems for liver transplant programmes. Living liver donation is a possible alternative, which could increase the amount of donor organs available in the short term. OBJECTIVE: To assess the attitude towards living organ donation in the general population to have an overview of the overall attitude within Germany. METHODS: A representative quota of people was evaluated by a mail questionnaire (n = 250). This questionnaire had 24 questions assessing the willingness to be a living liver donor for different potential recipients. Factors for and against living liver donation were assessed. RESULTS: Donating a part of the liver was almost as accepted as donating a kidney. The readiness to donate was highest when participants were asked to donate for children. In an urgent life-threatening situation the will to donate was especially high, whereas it was lower in the case of recipient substance misuse. More women than men expressed a higher disposition to donate for their children. Sex, religion, state of health and age of the donor, however, did not influence other questions on the readiness to consider living organ donation. The will for postmortem organ donation positively correlated with the will to be a living organ donor. CONCLUSIONS: The motivation in different demographic subgroups to participate in living liver transplantation is described. Differences in donation readiness resulting from the situation of every donor and recipient are thoroughly outlined. The acceptance for a living liver donation was found to be high - and comparable to that of living kidney donation.
Authors: J F Trotter; M Talamantes; M McClure; M Wachs; T Bak; T Trouillot; M Kugelmas; G T Everson; I Kam Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Gabriel Gondolesi; Luis Muñoz; Cal Matsumoto; Thomas Fishbein; Patricia Sheiner; Sukru Emre; Charles Miller; Myron E Schwartz Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2002 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: J C Wiederkehr; J C Pereira; M Ekermann; F Porto; W Kondo; I Nagima; W Amaral; C A Camargo; M Moreira Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: G F Wiesinger; M Quittan; K Zimmermann; M Nuhr; M Wichlas; M Bodingbauer; R Asari; G Berlakovich; R Crevenna; V Fialka-Moser; M Peck-Radosavljevic Journal: J Rehabil Med Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 2.912
Authors: Dieter C Broering; Christian Wilms; Pamela Bok; Lutz Fischer; Lars Mueller; Christian Hillert; Christian Lenk; Jong-Sun Kim; Martina Sterneck; Karl-Heinz Schulz; Gerrit Krupski; Axel Nierhaus; Detlef Ameis; Martin Burdelski; Xavier Rogiers Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Antonio Ríos; Ana Isabel López-Navas; Ana Isabel López-López; Francisco Javier Gómez; Jorge Iriarte; Rafael Herruzo; Gerardo Blanco; Francisco Javier Llorca; Angel Asunsolo; Pilar Sánchez-Gallegos; Pedro Ramón Gutiérrez; Ana Fernández; María Teresa de Jesús; Laura Martínez-Alarcón; Alberto Lana; Lorena Fuentes; Juan Ramón Hernández; Julio Virseda; José Yelamos; José Antonio Bondía; Antonio Miguel Hernández; Marco Antonio Ayala; Pablo Ramírez; Pascual Parrilla Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 5.742