OBJECTIVES: Brief episodes of ischemia and reperfusion after a lethal ischemic insult confer cardioprotection, a phenomenon termed "ischemic postconditioning." However, all studies reported to date have been conducted in open-chest animal models. We sought to determine whether postconditioning occurs in conscious animals and whether it protects against severe myocardial injury. METHODS: Chronically instrumented rats were assigned to a 30- (Subset 1), 45- (Subset 2), or 60-min (Subset 3) coronary occlusion followed by 24 h of reperfusion. In each subset, rats received no further intervention (control), were preconditioned with 12 cycles of 2-min occlusion/2-min reperfusion immediately (early preconditioning; EPC) or 24 h (late preconditioning; LPC) before myocardial infarction, or were postconditioned with 20 cycles of 10-s occlusion/10-s reperfusion immediately after myocardial infarction (20-10 PostC). RESULTS: With a 30-min occlusion, infarct size (54.4 +/- 2.3% of risk region in control-30) was significantly reduced in EPC-30, LPC-30, and 20-10 PostC-30 groups (by 72, 70, and 47%, respectively; all P < 0.05 vs. control-30). With a 45-min occlusion, infarct size (62.2 +/- 2.4% in control-45) was reduced in EPC-45 and LPC-45 groups (by 47 and 41%, respectively; all P < 0.05 vs. control-45) but not in the 20-10 PostC-45 group [55.4 +/- 2.3%, P = not significant (NS) vs. control-45]. With a 60-min occlusion, infarct size (72.7 +/- 2.2% in control-60) was reduced in the EPC-60 (by 20%, P < 0.05) but not in the LPC-60 (63.6 +/- 2.5%, P = NS) or in the 20-20 PostC group (71.5 +/- 3.4%, P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Both early and late ischemic preconditioning as well as ischemic postconditioning confer protection in conscious rats; however, unlike early preconditioning, postconditioning protects only against coronary occlusions <45 min. In the conscious rat, the cardioprotection afforded by postconditioning is limited to mild to moderate myocardial injury.
OBJECTIVES: Brief episodes of ischemia and reperfusion after a lethal ischemic insult confer cardioprotection, a phenomenon termed "ischemic postconditioning." However, all studies reported to date have been conducted in open-chest animal models. We sought to determine whether postconditioning occurs in conscious animals and whether it protects against severe myocardial injury. METHODS: Chronically instrumented rats were assigned to a 30- (Subset 1), 45- (Subset 2), or 60-min (Subset 3) coronary occlusion followed by 24 h of reperfusion. In each subset, rats received no further intervention (control), were preconditioned with 12 cycles of 2-min occlusion/2-min reperfusion immediately (early preconditioning; EPC) or 24 h (late preconditioning; LPC) before myocardial infarction, or were postconditioned with 20 cycles of 10-s occlusion/10-s reperfusion immediately after myocardial infarction (20-10 PostC). RESULTS: With a 30-min occlusion, infarct size (54.4 +/- 2.3% of risk region in control-30) was significantly reduced in EPC-30, LPC-30, and 20-10 PostC-30 groups (by 72, 70, and 47%, respectively; all P < 0.05 vs. control-30). With a 45-min occlusion, infarct size (62.2 +/- 2.4% in control-45) was reduced in EPC-45 and LPC-45 groups (by 47 and 41%, respectively; all P < 0.05 vs. control-45) but not in the 20-10 PostC-45 group [55.4 +/- 2.3%, P = not significant (NS) vs. control-45]. With a 60-min occlusion, infarct size (72.7 +/- 2.2% in control-60) was reduced in the EPC-60 (by 20%, P < 0.05) but not in the LPC-60 (63.6 +/- 2.5%, P = NS) or in the 20-20 PostC group (71.5 +/- 3.4%, P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Both early and late ischemic preconditioning as well as ischemic postconditioning confer protection in conscious rats; however, unlike early preconditioning, postconditioning protects only against coronary occlusions <45 min. In the conscious rat, the cardioprotection afforded by postconditioning is limited to mild to moderate myocardial injury.
Authors: Xi-Ming Yang; J Bradley Proctor; Lin Cui; Thomas Krieg; James M Downey; Michael V Cohen Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-09-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Michael E Halkos; Faraz Kerendi; Joel S Corvera; Ning-Ping Wang; Hajime Kin; Christopher S Payne; He-Ying Sun; Robert A Guyton; Jakob Vinten-Johansen; Zhi-Qing Zhao Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Zhi-Qing Zhao; Joel S Corvera; Michael E Halkos; Faraz Kerendi; Ning-Ping Wang; Robert A Guyton; Jakob Vinten-Johansen Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Katsuya Tanaka; Lynda M Ludwig; John G Krolikowski; Dunbar Alcindor; Phillip F Pratt; Judy R Kersten; Paul S Pagel; David C Warltier Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Lisa Schwartz Longacre; Robert A Kloner; Andrew E Arai; Christopher P Baines; Roberto Bolli; Eugene Braunwald; James Downey; Raymond J Gibbons; Roberta A Gottlieb; Gerd Heusch; Robert B Jennings; David J Lefer; Robert M Mentzer; Elizabeth Murphy; Michel Ovize; Peipei Ping; Karin Przyklenk; Michael N Sack; Richard S Vander Heide; Jakob Vinten-Johansen; Derek M Yellon Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-09-06 Impact factor: 29.690