Literature DB >> 16815772

Decision threshold adjustment in class prediction.

J J Chen1, C-A Tsai, H Moon, H Ahn, J J Young, C-H Chen.   

Abstract

Standard classification algorithms are generally designed to maximize the number of correct predictions (concordance). The criterion of maximizing the concordance may not be appropriate in certain applications. In practice, some applications may emphasize high sensitivity (e.g., clinical diagnostic tests) and others may emphasize high specificity (e.g., epidemiology screening studies). This paper considers effects of the decision threshold on sensitivity, specificity, and concordance for four classification methods: logistic regression, classification tree, Fisher's linear discriminant analysis, and a weighted k-nearest neighbor. We investigated the use of decision threshold adjustment to improve performance of either sensitivity or specificity of a classifier under specific conditions. We conducted a Monte Carlo simulation showing that as the decision threshold increases, the sensitivity decreases and the specificity increases; but, the concordance values in an interval around the maximum concordance are similar. For specified sensitivity and specificity levels, an optimal decision threshold might be determined in an interval around the maximum concordance that meets the specified requirement. Three example data sets were analyzed for illustrations.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16815772     DOI: 10.1080/10659360600787700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res        ISSN: 1026-776X            Impact factor:   3.000


  8 in total

1.  Delimitation of groundwater zones under contamination risk using a bagged ensemble of optimized DRASTIC frameworks.

Authors:  Rahim Barzegar; Asghar Asghari Moghaddam; Jan Adamowski; Amir Hossein Nazemi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Prediction of binding affinity for estrogen receptor alpha modulators using statistical learning approaches.

Authors:  Yonghua Wang; Yan Li; Jun Ding; Yuan Wang; Yaqing Chang
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 2.943

3.  Identifying sleep spindles with multichannel EEG and classification optimization.

Authors:  Ning Mei; Michael D Grossberg; Kenneth Ng; Karen T Navarro; Timothy M Ellmore
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.589

4.  Refinement and validation of the IDIOM score for predicting the risk of gastrointestinal cancer in iron deficiency anaemia.

Authors:  Orouba Almilaji; Carla Smith; Sue Surgenor; Andrew Clegg; Elizabeth Williams; Peter Thomas; Jonathon Snook
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-05

5.  Effect of Dataset Size and Train/Test Split Ratios in QSAR/QSPR Multiclass Classification.

Authors:  Anita Rácz; Dávid Bajusz; Károly Héberger
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Iterative guided machine learning-assisted systematic literature reviews: a diabetes case study.

Authors:  John Zimmerman; Robin E Soler; James Lavinder; Sarah Murphy; Charisma Atkins; LaShonda Hulbert; Richard Lusk; Boon Peng Ng
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-02

7.  Application of machine learning to understand child marriage in India.

Authors:  Anita Raj; Nabamallika Dehingia; Abhishek Singh; Lotus McDougal; Julian McAuley
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2020-12-05

8.  Feature extraction from MRI ADC images for brain tumor classification using machine learning techniques.

Authors:  Sahan M Vijithananda; Mohan L Jayatilake; Badra Hewavithana; Teresa Gonçalves; Luis M Rato; Bimali S Weerakoon; Tharindu D Kalupahana; Anil D Silva; Karuna D Dissanayake
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.903

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.