OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare sensory characteristics of six beverages prepared with four commercial thickeners used in dysphagia diets. DESIGN: The study used a completely randomized design within a test of each beverage. SUBJECTS/ SETTING: Five highly trained descriptive sensory analysis panelists conducted the testing in a laboratory environment. INTERVENTION: Coffee, milk, apple juice, orange juice, Ensure (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL), and water were thickened using two starch-based and two gum-based commercial thickeners according to manufacturers' instructions to achieve nectar-like and honey-like consistencies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensory attributes of the original beverages and the thickened samples were defined and scored. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Sensory scores were analyzed by analysis of variance using general linear models and Fisher's least significant difference test to determine specific differences. RESULTS: All thickeners suppressed the main flavors of the base beverages and imparted slight off-flavors (bitter, sour, metallic, or astringent) in some beverages. Starch-based thickeners imparted a starchy flavor and grainy texture, whereas gum-based thickeners gave added slickness to the beverages. Although thickeners mixed well with some beverages, they were difficult to disperse in others, making some thickened beverages lumpy. CONCLUSIONS: All thickeners added either a starchy, grainy, or slick flavor or texture and tended to suppress the base flavor of beverages, especially at honey-like consistencies. Thus, individual decisions about which characteristics are more negative (eg, slick vs grainy texture) for specific patients must be made. Additional development of thickening agents seems necessary for improved sensory properties. Information from this article should help professionals and their patients with dysphagia better understand the sensory issues associated with the use of commercial thickening agents in various beverages.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare sensory characteristics of six beverages prepared with four commercial thickeners used in dysphagia diets. DESIGN: The study used a completely randomized design within a test of each beverage. SUBJECTS/ SETTING: Five highly trained descriptive sensory analysis panelists conducted the testing in a laboratory environment. INTERVENTION: Coffee, milk, apple juice, orange juice, Ensure (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL), and water were thickened using two starch-based and two gum-based commercial thickeners according to manufacturers' instructions to achieve nectar-like and honey-like consistencies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensory attributes of the original beverages and the thickened samples were defined and scored. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Sensory scores were analyzed by analysis of variance using general linear models and Fisher's least significant difference test to determine specific differences. RESULTS: All thickeners suppressed the main flavors of the base beverages and imparted slight off-flavors (bitter, sour, metallic, or astringent) in some beverages. Starch-based thickeners imparted a starchy flavor and grainy texture, whereas gum-based thickeners gave added slickness to the beverages. Although thickeners mixed well with some beverages, they were difficult to disperse in others, making some thickened beverages lumpy. CONCLUSIONS: All thickeners added either a starchy, grainy, or slick flavor or texture and tended to suppress the base flavor of beverages, especially at honey-like consistencies. Thus, individual decisions about which characteristics are more negative (eg, slick vs grainy texture) for specific patients must be made. Additional development of thickening agents seems necessary for improved sensory properties. Information from this article should help professionals and their patients with dysphagia better understand the sensory issues associated with the use of commercial thickening agents in various beverages.
Authors: Laura W J Baijens; Margaret Walshe; Leena-Maija Aaltonen; Christoph Arens; Reinie Cordier; Patrick Cras; Lise Crevier-Buchman; Chris Curtis; Wojciech Golusinski; Roganie Govender; Jesper Grau Eriksen; Kevin Hansen; Kate Heathcote; Markus M Hess; Sefik Hosal; Jens Peter Klussmann; C René Leemans; Denise MacCarthy; Beatrice Manduchi; Jean-Paul Marie; Reza Nouraei; Claire Parkes; Christina Pflug; Walmari Pilz; Julie Regan; Nathalie Rommel; Antonio Schindler; Annemie M W J Schols; Renee Speyer; Giovanni Succo; Irene Wessel; Anna C H Willemsen; Taner Yilmaz; Pere Clavé Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2020-12-19 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Z Vickers; H Damodhar; C Grummer; H Mendenhall; K Banaszynski; R Hartel; J Hind; A Joyce; A Kaufman; J Robbins Journal: Dysphagia Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 3.438