Literature DB >> 16814875

Evaluation of speech intelligibility for children with cleft lip and palate by means of automatic speech recognition.

Maria Schuster1, Andreas Maier, Tino Haderlein, Emeka Nkenke, Ulrike Wohlleben, Frank Rosanowski, Ulrich Eysholdt, Elmar Nöth.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cleft lip and palate (CLP) may cause functional limitations even after adequate surgical and non-surgical treatment, speech disorders being one of them. Interindividually, they vary a lot, showing typical articulation specifics such as nasal emission and shift of articulation and therefore a diminished intelligibility. Until now, an objective means to determine and quantify the intelligibility does not exist.
METHOD: An automatic speech recognition system, a new method, was applied on recordings of a standard test to evaluate articulation disorders (psycholinguistic analysis of speech disorders of children PLAKSS) of 31 children at the age of 10.1+/-3.8 years. Two had an isolated cleft lip, 20 a unilateral cleft lip and palate, 4 a bilateral cleft lip and palate, and 5 an isolated cleft palate. The speech recognition system was trained with adults and children without speech disorders and adapted to the speech of children with CLP. In this study, the automatic speech evaluation focussed on the word accuracy which represents the percentage of correctly recognized words. Results were confronted to a perceptive evaluation of intelligibility that was performed by a panel of three experts.
RESULTS: The automatic speech recognition yielded word accuracies between 1.2 and 75.8% (mean 48.0+/-19.6%). The word accuracy was lowest for children with isolated cleft palate (36.9+/-23.3) and highest for children with isolated cleft lip (72.8+/-2.9). For children with unilateral cleft lip and palate it was 48.0+/-18.6 and for children with bilateral cleft lip and palate 49.3+/-9.4. The automatic evaluation complied with the experts' subjective evaluation of intelligibility (p<0.01). The multi-rater kappa of the experts alone differed only slightly from the multi-rater kappa of experts and recognizer.
CONCLUSION: Automatic speech recognition may serve as a good means to objectify and quantify global speech outcome of children with cleft lip and palate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16814875     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  7 in total

1.  [Validation of an automatic speech analysis in children with isolated cleft palate].

Authors:  A Schulz; T Bocklet; U Eysholdt; C Bohr; M Döllinger; A Ziethe
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  The use of automatic speech recognition showing the influence of nasality on speech intelligibility.

Authors:  S Mayr; K Burkhardt; M Schuster; K Rogler; A Maier; H Iro
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Reliability and validity of a computer-mediated, single-word intelligibility test: preliminary findings for children with repaired cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  David J Zajac; Caitrin Plante; Amanda Lloyd; Katarina L Haley
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2010-09-08

4.  Global and communicative development skills in preschool children with cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Mayalle Rocha Bonfim Jurado; Maria Gabriela Cavalheiro; Camila de Castro Corrêa; Melina Evangelista Whitaker; Simone Rocha de Vasconcelos Hage; Dionísia Aparecida Cusin Lamônica; Luciana Paula Maximino
Journal:  Pediatr Investig       Date:  2021-03-22

5.  Demographic characteristics, care, and outcomes for children with oral clefts in three states using participants from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.

Authors:  Peter Damiano; Margaret Tyler; Paul A Romitti; Charlotte Druschel; April A Austin; Whitney Burnett; Sara Kizelnik-Freilich; James M Robbins
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2009-06-29

6.  [Numeric quantification of intelligibility in schoolchildren with isolated and combined cleft palate].

Authors:  B Vogt; A Maier; A Batliner; E Nöth; E Nkenke; U Eysholdt; M Schuster
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 7.  Outcome measurements after oral cancer treatment: speech and speech-related aspects--an overview.

Authors:  M Schuster; F Stelzle
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-08-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.